Universal credit : the impact on passported benefits : report by the Social Security Advisory Committee and response by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
著者
書誌事項
Universal credit : the impact on passported benefits : report by the Social Security Advisory Committee and response by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
(Cm, 8332)
Stationery Office, c2012
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
"Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions by Command of Her Majesty March 2012"
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In May 2011, the Department for Work and Pensions commissioned the Social Security Advisory Committee to undertake an independent review of passported benefits and how they link with Universal Credit. Passported benefits were defined as those additional benefits to which working-age claimants on certain means-tested benefits and tax credits are automatically entitled. The SSAC broadly considered them in four groups: education, health, utilities and access to justice. They did not consider Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit, and referred only briefly to benefits within the Social Fund. The SSAC found that all passported benefits fulfill important needs, are highly valued by those who receive them and make significant social contributions. Options for the future should not undermine policy objectives and it is unlikely that one approach will suit all passported benefits. Review respondents identified a tension between three key factors: reducing complexity, making work pay while maintaining a range of policy objectives and keeping costs neutral. One of the simplest solutions offered was extending eligibility for passported benefits to everyone receiving UC.
This option, though, would not meet the constraint of cost-neutrality. Alternatively income thresholds within UC could be imposed, below which claimants are automatically entitled to receive certain passported benefits. To alleviate the cliff-edge it would also be possible to: impose an earnings disregard, allow the benefit to run-on for a period of time after the cut-off point has been reached, withdraw the benefit in a stepped taper. The Coalition Government recognises the opportunities and challenges but notes that there has already been a considerable amount of work undertaken and believes there is scope to deliver
「Nielsen BookData」 より