Nature and nurture in French social sciences, 1859-1914 and beyond
著者
書誌事項
Nature and nurture in French social sciences, 1859-1914 and beyond
（McGill-Queen's studies in the history of ideas, 53）
McGill-Queen's University Press, c2011
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全3件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Bibliography: p. [213]-251
Includes index
HTTP:URL=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1209/2011410990-b.html Information=Contributor biographical information
HTTP:URL=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1209/2011410990-d.html Information=Publisher description
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The prevailing assumption has been that French ethnographers highlighted the cultural and social environment while anthropologists emphasized the scientific study of head and body shapes. Martin Staum shows that the temptation to gravitate towards one pole of the nature-nurture continuum often resulted in reluctant concessions to the other side. Psychologists Theodule Ribot and Alfred Binet, for example, were forced to recognize the importance of social factors. Non-Durkheimian sociologists were divided on the issue of race and gender as progressive and tolerant attitudes on race did not necessarily correlate with flexible attitudes on gender. Recognizing this allows Staum to raise questions about the theory of the equivalence of all marginalized groups. Anthropological institutions re-organized before the First World War sometimes showed decreasing confidence in racial theory but failed to abandon it completely. Staum's chilling epilogue discusses how the persistent legacy of such theories was used by extremist anthropologists outside the mainstream to deploy racial ideology as a basis of persecution in the Vichy era.
「Nielsen BookData」 より