Cost reduction in central government : summary of progress : eightieth report of session 2010-12 : report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Cost reduction in central government : summary of progress : eightieth report of session 2010-12 : report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence
(HC, 1845)
Stationery Office, 2012
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
At head of title: House of Commons. Committee of Public Accounts
"Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 March 2012"
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This report examines recent progress made with cost reduction by central government departments and planning for the current spending review period from 2010 to 2015. After the 2010 election, the incoming government reduced departments' budgets for the 2010-11 financial year by a total of GBP6 billion. Departments successfully lived within these reduced budgets in 2010-11 and reduced spending within their control by 2.3% in real terms compared to 2009-10. Most departments, however, now face a more significant challenge: to reduce spending by a further 19% over the next four years with the prospect of further savings being required thereafter. The bulk of the spending reductions must be delivered by individual spending departments and their arm's length bodies. Departmental financial planning has not yet made it clear how these cost reductions will be achieved. Departments lack clear information on costs which, when coupled with the difficulty of linking inputs with outputs, raises the risk that future spending cuts may not maximise efficiency in delivery and may have a greater than intended impact on frontline services.
There is an essential role for the central departments to lead a more structured cost reduction programme across government so that spending is reduced, as far as possible, by improving value for money, not cutting services. The Treasury and Cabinet Office need to set out exactly what they expect of departments in planning for, and reporting on, cost reductions. Accounting officers must be held accountable for the successes and failures of their departments not just to reduce spending in absolute terms, but to deliver more with less
by "Nielsen BookData"