Objectivity in law and legal reasoning
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Objectivity in law and legal reasoning
(European Academy of legal theory series, v. 10)
Hart, 2013
Available at 9 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
"A selection of papers presented in an earlier version at the 6th Benelux-Scandinavian Symposium on Legal Theory, held in Rovaniemi (Lapland) on 8-10 June 2011"--Pref
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Legal theorists consider their discipline as an objective endeavour in line with other fields of science. Objectivity in science is generally regarded as a fundamental condition, informing how science should be practised and how truths may be found. Objective scientists venture to uncover empirical truths about the world and ought to eliminate personal biases, prior commitments and emotional involvement. However, legal theorists are inevitably bound up with a given legal culture. Consequently, their scholarly work derives at least in part from this environment and their subtle interaction with it. This book questions critically, in novel ways and from various perspectives, the possibilities of objectivity of legal theory in the twenty-first century. It transpires that legal theory is unavoidably confronted with varying conceptions of law, underlying ideologies, approaches to legal method, argumentation and discourse etc, which limit the possibilities of 'objectivity' in law and in legal reasoning. The authors of this book reveal some of these underlying notions and discuss their consequences for legal theory.
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
1. Objectivity in Law and Jurisprudence
Mark Van Hoecke
II. Objectivity of Legal Theory
2. Can Legal Theory Be Objective?
Jaap Hage
3. The Impossibility of an Outsider's Perspective
Pauline C Westerman
III. Legal Reasoning
4. Objective Legal Reasoning-Objectivity Without Objects
Matti Ilmari Niemi
5. Legal Certainty as an Element of Objectivity in Law
Juha Raitio
6. Objective Rules of Argumentation
Bertjan Wolthuis
7. Easy Cases and Objective Interpretation
Niko Soininen
IV. Human Behaviour and its Objective Foundation
8. Can Inalienable Rights Provide an Objective Foundation for Law and Morality?
Maija Aalto-Heinila
9. Objectivity and the Law's Assumptions about Human Behaviour
Peter Cserne
V. (Legal) Cultures
10. Kaleidoscopic Cultural Views and Legal Theory-Dethroning the Objectivity?
Jaakko Husa
11. Translators and Legal Comparatists as Objective Mediators between Cultures?
Caroline Laske
12. Legal Science Challenged by Cultural Paradigms: 'Subjective Objectivity' in Legal Scholarship
Mustapha El Karouni
by "Nielsen BookData"