Justified killing : the paradox of self-defense
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Justified killing : the paradox of self-defense
Lexington Books, c2009
- : cloth
Available at / 1 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Bibliography: p. 153-161
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The right of self-defense is seemingly at odds with the general presupposition that killing is wrong; numerous theories have been put forth over the years that attempt to explain how self-defense is consistent with such a presupposition. In Justified Killing: The Paradox of Self-Defense, Whitley Kaufman argues that none of the leading theories adequately explains why it is permissible even to kill an innocent attacker in self-defense, given the basic moral prohibition against killing the innocent. Kaufman suggests that such an explanation can be found in the traditional Doctrine of Double Effect, according to which self-defense is justified because the intention of the defender is to protect himself rather than harm the attacker. Given this morally legitimate intention, self-defense is permissible against both culpable and innocent aggressors, so long as the force used is both necessary and proportionate. Justified Killing will intrigue in particular those scholars interested in moral and legal philosophy.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Chapter One: Introduction Chapter 2 Chapter Two: The Principles of Self-Defense Chapter 3 Chapter Three: The Leading Theories of Self-Defense Chapter 4 Chapter Four: The Doctrine of Double Effect Chapter 5 Chapter Five: Double Effect and Common Sense Morality Chapter 6 Chapter Six: Can Double Effect Justify Self-Defense? Chapter 7 Chapter Seven: Conclusion: Justifying Self-Defense
by "Nielsen BookData"
