The restatement third : restitution and unjust enrichment : critical and comparative essays
著者
書誌事項
The restatement third : restitution and unjust enrichment : critical and comparative essays
(Hart studies in private law, v. 6)
Hart, 2013
大学図書館所蔵 全10件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The publication of the Restatement Third: Unjust Enrichment and Restitution by the American Law Institute in July 2010 was an event of major importance, not only for the development of the law of unjust enrichment in the US, but also for global scholarship relating to this area of private law. The Restatement First appeared in 1937, and the Restatement Second was abandoned; hence the Restatement Third is the most significant survey of the American law on this topic for over 70 years. Private law has been a comparatively neglected area of study in US law schools for several decades, and this is particularly true of the law of unjust enrichment. However, the appearance of the Restatement Third has prompted a renewal of interest in the subject among US scholars, and it is hoped that the present volume of essays will contribute to this revival, while reflecting on the lessons to be learned from the Restatement by other legal systems. Featuring the work of leading scholars from the UK, Germany, South Africa, Canada, Hong Kong and Australia, the essays undertake critical and comparative analysis of the Restatement, and offer fresh insights into the rules that it articulates.
目次
Ben McFarlane (Oxford) - 'Enrichment by Value and Rights'
Birke Hacker (Munich) - 'A Comparative Perspective on Indirect Enrichment'
Jacques du Plessis (Stellenbosch) - 'Duress and Compulsion'
William Swadling (Oxford) - 'Undue Influence'
Frederick Wilmot-Smith (Oxford) - 'Failure of Basis'
James Goudkamp (Oxford) and Charles Mitchell (UCL) - 'Absent Element and Affirmative Defences in the Law of Unjust Enrichment'
Andrew Burrows (Oxford) - 'Good Consideration'
Keith Mason (New South Wales) - 'Proprietary Remedies'
Lusina Ho (Hong Kong) - 'Restitutionary Trusts'
Steve Smith (McGill) - 'A Theory of Remedies'
Nicholas McBride (Cambridge) - 'Restitution for Wrongs'
Gerhard Dannemann (Humboldt) - 'The R3RUE and the DCFR'
「Nielsen BookData」 より