Utilitarianism and the new liberalism
著者
書誌事項
Utilitarianism and the new liberalism
(Ideas in context / edited by Quentin Skinner (general editor) ... [et al.], 83)
Cambridge University Press, 2011, c2007
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. 204-214
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In this study, David Weinstein argues that nineteenth-century English New Liberalism was considerably more indebted to classical English utilitarianism than the received view holds. T. H. Green, L. T. Hobhouse, D. G. Ritchie and J. A. Hobson were liberal consequentialists who followed J. S. Mill in trying to accommodate robust, liberal moral rights with the normative goal of promoting self-realisation. Through careful interpretation of each, Weinstein shows how these theorists brought together themes from idealism, perfectionism and especially utilitarianism to create the new liberalism. Like Mill, they were committed to liberalising consequentialism and systematising liberalism. Because they were no less consequentialists than they were liberals, they constitute a greatly undervalued resource, Mill notwithstanding, for contemporary moral philosophers who remain dedicated to defending a coherent form of liberal consequentialism. The New Liberals had already travelled much of the philosophical ground that contemporary liberal consequentialists are unknowingly retravelling.
目次
- 1. Introduction
- Part I. Consequentialist Perfectionism: 2. Between Kantianism and Utilitarianism: T. H. Green
- 3. Between Utilitarianism and Perfectionism: L. T. Hobhouse
- 4. Excursus: Green, Hobhouse and contemporary moral philosophy
- Part II. 'New Utilitarianism': 5. Vindicating Utilitarianism: D. G. Ritchie
- 6. Utilitarian Socialism: J. A. Hobson
- 7. Conclusion.
「Nielsen BookData」 より