Best practices in faculty evaluation : a practical guide for academic leaders
著者
書誌事項
Best practices in faculty evaluation : a practical guide for academic leaders
Jossey-Bass, c2012
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
BEST PRACTICES IN FACULTY EVALUATION
Best Practices in Faculty Evaluation is designed to be a hands-on guide for academics and administrators who want to become more effective and more confident in their handling of the important task of faculty evaluation. This vital resource offers chairs, deans, and members of evaluation committees the practical information they need to perform fair and accurate faculty evaluation.
The book covers best practices in all forms of review and evaluation and includes directions that are designed to help evaluators understand how to use the information about faculty performance, convey clear messages about priorities, and protect themselves in cases when an appeal or grievance is likely. Best Practices in Faculty Evaluation is filled with practical advice and answers to commonly asked questions about oral and written reviews and evaluations, annual performance appraisals and evaluations, probationary and pretenure reviews, posttenure reviews, merit evaluations, tenure evaluations, promotion evaluations, and much more.
In today's complex academic environment there is no longer a "typical" full-time, tenure-eligible faculty member. The staff of most colleges and universities includes increasing numbers of part-time faculty members, non-tenure-track faculty members, and even online course instructors whom the reviewer never meets in person. To address the wide range of diverse faculty members, the author offers clear guidance for evaluating both tenure-tracked faculty and nontraditional faculty members.
目次
The Author ix
Introduction and Acknowledgments xi
Part One: The Fundamental Goals of Review and Evaluation 1
1 The Accountability Culture in Higher Education 3
2 Best Practices in All Forms of Review and Evaluation 23
3 Oral and Written Reviews and Evaluations 43
Part Two: Primarily Formative Review and Evaluation 65
4 Annual Performance Appraisals and Evaluations 67
5 Probationary Period Pretenure Reviews 89
6 Posttenure Review 109
Part Three: Summative Review and Evaluation 129
7 Merit Evaluations 131
8 Tenure Evaluations 151
9 Promotion Evaluations 173
Part Four: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Review and Evaluation 191
10 The Arreola Model 193
11 The Seldin Model 215
12 Incorporating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches into an Integrated Process 229
Index 249
「Nielsen BookData」 より