Addiction and weakness of will
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Addiction and weakness of will
（International perspectives in philosophy and psychiatry / edited by Bill (K.W.M.) Fulford ... [et al.]）
Oxford University Press, 2013
- : pbk
Available at / 4 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [140]-145) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The way in which society views addiction underlies how it treats, understands, blames, or even punishes those with addictive behaviours.
This thought-provoking new book presents an original philosophical analysis bringing together addiction and weakness of will. Within the book, the author develops an integrated account of these two phenomena, rooted in a classical conception of akrasia as valuing without intending and at the same time intending without valuing. This fascinating and suggestive account addresses a number of paradoxes faced by current thinking about addiction and weakness of will, in particular the significance of
control and intention for responsible action.
Addiction and Weakness of Will makes an original contribution to central issues in moral psychology and philosophy of action, including the relationship between responsibility and intentional agency, and the nature and scope of moral appraisal. The book is valuable for philosophers, ethicists and psychiatrists with an interest in philosophy.
Table of Contents
- Introduction: The Moral Philosophy of Addiction and Weakness of Will
- 1. Addiction and Voluntary Control
- 1.1 Wallace on Responsibility and Control
- 1.2 The Disparity of Actions and Attitudes
- 1.3 Responsibility for Addiction: Excuses and Exemptions
- 1.4 Actions and Omissions Revisited
- 1.5 Positive Moral Appraisal
- 2. Addiction and Rational Judgement
- 2.1 Smith on Responsibility for Attitudes
- 2.2 Responsible Irrationality
- 2.2.1 Conflicting Attitudes
- 2.2.2 Implications for Paradigm Cases: Patterns of Awareness and Wholehearted Attitudes
- 2.3 Is Responsibility Best Understood as a Cluster Concept?
- 2.4 Addiction and Agential Evaluative Stance
- 2.4.1 De Quincey: Confessions of an English Opium Eater
- 2.4.2 Dostoevsky: The Gambler
- 3. Weakness of Will and Moral Appraisal
- 3.1 Arplay on Responsibility in the Absence of Control
- 3.2 Standard Akrasia
- 3.3 Inverse Akrasia
- 3.3.1 Inept Burglar
- 3.3.2 Neoptolemus
- 3.3.3 Huckleberry Finn
- 3.4 Strength Versus Goodness of Will
- 3.4.1 Mizogushi
- 4. Before Weakness of Will
- 4.1 Holton on Weakness of Will
- 4.2 Aristotle on Akrasia
- 4.2.1 The Logical Form of Akrasia
- 4.2.2 The Blameworthiness of Akrasia
- 4.2.3 The Pre-Intentionality of Akrasia
- 4.3 Revisting Weakness of Will
- 4.4 Weakness of Will as a Failure to Resist Akrasia
- 5. Addiction and Weakness of Will: An Integrated Account
- 5.1 Actions as Actualization
- 5.2 Success in Action and the Guise of the Good
- 5.3 Less than Successful Actions
- 5.4 Concluding Remarks:The Offspring of Akrasia
by "Nielsen BookData"
