Paul and pseudepigraphy
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Paul and pseudepigraphy
(Pauline studies, v. 8)
Brill, 2013
- : hardback
Available at 5 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and indexes
Description and Table of Contents
Description
In Paul and Pseudepigraphy, an international group of scholars engage open questions in the study of the Apostle Paul and those documents often deemed pseudepigraphal. This volume addresses many traditional questions, including those of method and the authenticity of several canonical Pauline letters, but they also reflect a desire to think in new ways about persistent questions surrounding pseudepigraphy. The focus on pseudepigraphy in relationship to Paul affords a unique opportunity to address this innovative inclination, not readily available in studies of New Testament pseudepigraphy in general. Regarding these concerns, new approaches are introduced, traditional evidence is reassessed, and some new suggestions are offered. In addition to Pauline letters, treatments of related non-canonical Pauline pseudepigraphs are included in discussion.
Table of Contents
Stanley E. Porter and Gregory P. Fewster. On Pauline Pseudepigraphy: An Introduction
I. Critical Issues in Pauline Pseudepigraphy
Armin D. Baum, Authorship and Pseudepigraphy in Early Christian Literature: A Translation of the Most Important Source Texts and an Annotated Bibliography
Stanley E. Porter, Pauline Chronology and the Question of Pseudonymity of the Pastoral Epistles
Gregory P. Fewster, Hermeneutical Issues in Canonical Pseudepigrapha: The Head/Body Motif in the Pauline Corpus as a Test Case
Andrew W. Pitts, Style and Pseudonymity in Pauline Scholarship
H. J. van Ness, The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles: An Important Hypothesis Reconsidered
II. Pauline Pseudepigraphy within the Christian Canon
Sigurd Grindheim, A Deutero-Pauline Mystery? Ecclesiology in Colossians and Ephesians
Christina M. Kreinecker, The Imitation Hypothesis: Pseudepigraphic Remarks on 2 Thessalonians with Help from Documentary Papyri
Linda L. Belleville, Christology, Greco-Roman Religious Piety, and the Pseudonymity of the Pastoral Letters
Clare K. Rothschild, Hebrews as an Instructional Appendix to Romans
Bryan R. Dyer, The Epistolary Closing of Hebrews and Pauline Imitation
III. Pauline Pseudepigraphy outside the Christian Canon
Philip L. Tite, Dusting off a Pseudo-Historical Letter: Re-thinking the Epistolary Aspects of the Apocryphal Epistle to the Laodiceans
Ilaria Ramelli, The Pseudepigraphical Correspondance between Seneca and Paul: A Reassessment
Michael Kaler, The Heretics' Apostle and Two Pauline Pseudepigrapha from Nag Hammadi
by "Nielsen BookData"