Central European constitutional courts in the face of EU membership : the influence of the German model in Hungary and Poland
著者
書誌事項
Central European constitutional courts in the face of EU membership : the influence of the German model in Hungary and Poland
(Constitutional law library, v. 6)
Martinus Nijhoff, 2013
- : hbk
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Central European Constitutional Courts in the Face of EU Membership explores the enduring German legal influence on other systems of constitutional justice, concentrating on the impact of the Federal Constitutional Court's approach to EU integration on its counterparts in Hungary and Poland.
Such a model aims to protect Germany's constitutional identity or essential core of sovereignty, the contents of which are not susceptible to transfer or limitation, in the face of the requirements of the Union's constitutional legal order.
The influence of this model on the two Central European courts has encouraged them to take an active part in negotiating the new multilayered judicial construct of Europe. Tatham thus firmly places the Hungarian and Polish constitutional courts within the overall context of the continuing dialogue between national courts and the Court of Justice in the evolution of the European constitutional space.
目次
- Acknowledgments
- Permissions
- Table of Cases Cited
- Table of Legislation Construed
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: A. Objectives of Research
- B. Methodology of the Research
- C. Structure of the Research
- Chapter One: The General EU Constitutional Context Background
- A. Judicial Construction of the EU Constitution
- B. Framework for Constitutional Court Reticence vis-a-vis European Integration
- C. Transjudicial Communication in the EU
- D. Conclusion
- Chapter Two:The Predominance of The German Model in Central Europe: Migrations of Legal and Constitutional Ideas Background
- A. Relevant Legal Models for Central Europe
- B. Relevancy of the German Model in Central Europe
- C. Conclusion
- Chapter Three:The German Federal Constitutional Court and European Law: A Case of "Thus Far, and No Further"? Background
- A. Constitutional Review
- B. Essential Core of Sovereignty
- C. Transfers of Sovereignty and European Integration
- D. National Constitutional Court Acceptance
- E. Limits to National Constitutional Court Acceptance
- F. Concluding Observations
- Chapter Four:The Hungarian Constitutional Court and European Law: A Case Of "Slow And Steady Wins The Race"? Background
- A. Constitutional Review
- B. Essential Core of Sovereignty
- C. Transfers of Sovereignty and European Integration
- D. National Constitutional Court Acceptance
- E. Limits to National Constitutional Court Acceptance
- F. Concluding Observations
- Chapter Five: The Polish Constitutional Tribunal and European Law: A Case of "Sovereignty Regained"? Background
- A. Constitutional Review
- B. Essential Core of Sovereignty
- C. Transfers of Sovereignty and European Integration
- D. National Constitutional Court Acceptance
- E. Limits to National Court Acceptance
- F. Concluding Observations
- Chapter Six: Conclusion A. Overall Context of the Conclusion
- B. The Issue of Constitutional Pluralism for Constitutional Courts: The Current Situation Explained?
- C. A Controversial Proposal
- D. Final Remarks
- Bibliography
- Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より