Thinking like a planet : the land ethic and the earth ethic

著者

書誌事項

Thinking like a planet : the land ethic and the earth ethic

J. Baird Callicott

Oxford University Press, c2013

  • : hardcover
  • : [pbk.]

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全7件

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Includes bibliographical references and index

内容説明・目次

内容説明

Bringing together ecology, evolutionary moral psychology, and environmental ethics, J. Baird Callicott counters the narrative of blame and despair that prevails in contemporary discussions of climate ethics and offers a fresh, more optimistic approach. Whereas other environmental ethicists limit themselves to what Callicott calls Rational Individualism in discussing the problem of climate change only to conclude that, essentially, there is little hope that anything will be done in the face of its "perfect moral storm" (in Stephen Gardiner's words), Callicott refuses to accept this view. Instead, he encourages us to look to the Earth itself, and consider the crisis on grander spatial and temporal scales, as we have failed to in the past. Callicott supports this theory by exploring and enhancing Aldo Leopold's faint sketch of an Earth ethic in "Some Fundamentals of Conservation in the Southwest," a seldom-studied text from the early days of environmental ethics that was written in 1923 but not published until 1979 after the environmental movement gathered strength.

目次

  • Introduction
  • PART 1: THE LAND ETHIC
  • 1. A Sand County Almanac
  • 1.1 The Author
  • 1.2 The Provenance of the Book
  • 1.3 The Unity of A Sand County Almanac-An Evolutionary-Ecological Worldview
  • 1.4 The Argument of the Foreword-Toward Worldview Remediation
  • 1.5 The Argument in Part I-The Inter-subjective Biotic Community-Introduced
  • 1.6 The Argument of Part I-The Inter-subjective Biotic Community-Driven Home
  • 1.7 The Argument in Part II-The Evolutionary Aspect: Time and Telos
  • 1.8 The Argument in Part II-The Evolutionary Aspect: Beauty, Kinship, and Spirituality
  • 1.9 The Argument of Part II-The Ecological Aspect
  • 1.10 The Argument of Part II-The Pivotal Trope: "Thinking Like a Mountain"
  • 1.11 Norton's Narrow Interpretation of Leopold's Worldview-remediation Project
  • 1.12 The Argument of Part III-To "See" with the Ecologist's "Mental Eye"
  • 1.13 The Argument of Part III-Axiological Implications of the Evolutionary-Ecological Worldview
  • 1.14 The Argument of Part III-The Normative Implications of the Evolutionary-Ecological Worldview
  • 1.15 The Persuasive Power of Leopold's Style of Writing
  • 1.16 The New Shifting Paradigm in Ecology and the Evolutionary-Ecological Worldview
  • 1.17 The Challenge Before Us
  • 2. The Land Ethic: A Critical Account of Its Philosophical and Evolutionary Foundations
  • 2.1 The Odysseus Vignette
  • 2.2 Expansion of the Scope of Ethics Over Time (?)
  • 2.3 Ethical Criteria/Norms/Ideals versus (un)Ethical Behavior/Practice
  • 2.4 Ethics Ecologically (Biologically) Speaking
  • 2.5 Darwin's Account of the Origin of Ethics by Natural Selection
  • 2.6 Darwin's Account of the Extension of Ethics
  • 2.7 The Community Concept in Ecology
  • 2.8 The Humean Foundations of Darwin's Evolutionary Account of the Moral Sense
  • 2.9 Universalism and Relativism: Hume and Darwin
  • 2.10 How Hume Anticipates Darwin's Account of the Origin and Expansion of Ethics
  • 2.11 Shades of the Social-Contract Theory of Ethics in "The Land Ethic"
  • 2.12 Individualism in (Benthamic) Utilitarianism and (Kantian) Deontology
  • 2.13 Holism in Hume's Moral Philosophy
  • 2.14 Holism in "The Land Ethic"
  • 2.15 The Land Ethic and the Problem of Ecofascism Resolved
  • 2.16 Prioritizing Cross-community Duties and Obligations
  • 2.17 Is The Land Ethic Anthropocentric or Non-anthropocentric?
  • 3. The Land Ethic (an Ought): A Critical Account of Its Ecological Foundations (an Is)
  • 3.1 Moore's Naturalistic Fallacy
  • 3.2 Hume's Is/Ought Dichotomy and the Land Ethic
  • 3.3 How Hume Bridges the Lacuna Between Is-statements and Ought-statements
  • 3.4 How Kant Infers Ought-statements from Is-statements in Hypothetical Imperatives
  • 3.5 The Specter of Hume's Is/Ought Dichotomy Finally Exorcised
  • 3.6 The Roles of Reason and Feeling in Hume's Ethical Theory Generally and Leopold's Land Ethic Particularly
  • 3.7 How the General Theory of Evolution Informs the Land Ethic
  • 3.8 How Ecosystem Ecology Informs the Land Ethic-Beyond the Biota
  • 3.9 How Ecosystem Ecology Informs the Land Ethic-A Fountain of Energy
  • 3.10 How Organismic Ecology Informs the Land Ethic
  • 3.11 How Mechanistic Ecology Informs the Land Ethic
  • 3.12 How the Ecosystem Paradigm Returns Ecology to Its Organismic Roots
  • 3.13 How Leopold Anticipates Hierarchy Theory in "The Land Ethic"
  • 3.14 Ecological Ontology and the Community Paradigm in Ecology
  • 3.15 Ecological Ontology and the Ecosystem Paradigm in Ecology
  • 3.16 The "Flux of Nature" Paradigm Shift in Contemporary Ecology and "The Land Ethic"
  • 3.17 A Revised Summary Moral Maxim for the Land Ethic
  • 4. The Land Ethic and the Science of Ethics: From the Seventeenth through the Twentieth Centuries
  • 4.1 Hobbes's Science of Ethics
  • 4.2 Locke's Science of Ethics
  • 4.3 Hume's Science of Ethics
  • 4.4 Kant's Science of Ethics
  • 4.5 The Utilitarian Science of Ethics
  • 4.6 How Logical Positivism Cleaved Apart Science and Ethics
  • 4.7 Ayer's Migration of a Science of Ethics from Philosophy to the Social Sciences
  • 4.8 Kohlberg's Social Science of Ethics
  • 4.9 Gilligan's Social Science of Ethics
  • 4.10 Group Selection in Darwin's Science of Ethics
  • 4.11 Group Selection in Wynne-Edwards's Evolutionary Biology
  • 4.12 Williams's Attack on Group Selection
  • 4.13 Huxley's and Williams's Anti-natural (and Anti-logical) View of Ethics
  • 4.14 Sociobiology: Wilson's Neo-Darwinian Account of the Origin of Ethics
  • 4.15 The Fallacies of Division and Composition in the Sociobiological Science of Ethics
  • 4.16 Sociobiology and Biological Determinism
  • 4.17 The Evolutionary Foundations of the Land Ethic in Light of the Modern and the New Syntheses in Evolutionary Biology
  • 5. The Land Ethic and the Science of Ethics: In the Light of Evolutionary Moral Psychology
  • 5.1 Singer's Response to the Evolutionary Account of Ethics
  • 5.2 Rachels' Response to the Evolutionary Account of Ethics
  • 5.3 Darwin's Alternative to Animal Ethics a la Singer and Rachels
  • 5.4 Midgley's Alternative to Animal Ethics a la Singer and Rachels
  • 5.5 A Community-based Analysis of Ethical Partiality
  • 5.6 A Community-based Analysis of Ethical Impartiality
  • 5.7 Dennett, Singer, Arnhart, and Haidt on the Philosophical Implications of Darwinism
  • 5.8 Group Selection Revisited
  • 5.9 The Analogy between Language and Ethics
  • 5.10 Hume on Nature and Nurture in Ethics
  • 5.11 Post-Positivist Ethical Absolutism
  • 5.12 Wherefore Post-Positivist Ethical Rationalism and Exclusionism
  • 5.13 Moral Norms in Humean Ethics Analogous to Medical Norms
  • 5.14 Critically Appraising Moral Norms in Terms of Intra-social Functionality and Inter-social Harmony
  • 5.15 A Humean-Darwinian Science of Ethics and Constrained Cultural Relativism
  • 5.16 The Philosophical Foundations of the Land Ethic Vindicated by the Contemporary Science of Ethics, but Limited to Ecological Spatial and Temporal Scales
  • PART II: THE EARTH ETHIC
  • 6. The Earth Ethic: A Critical Account of Its Philosophical Foundations
  • 6.1 Leopold and Biblical Tropes
  • 6.2 Ezekiel and Virtue Ethics-Both Individualistc and Holistic
  • 6.3 Ezekiel and Responsibility to Future Generations
  • 6.4 Ezekiel and Deontological Respect for the Earth as a Living Thing
  • 6.5 Leopold Dimly Envisions Hierarchy Theory in "Some Fundamentals"
  • 6.6 How Leopold Interprets P. D. Ouspensky and His Book, Tertium Organum
  • 6.7 The Earth's Soul or Consciousness
  • 6.8 A Scalar Resolution of a "Dead" Earth versus the Earth as a "Living Being"
  • 6.9 Respect for Life as Such
  • 6.10 Leopold's Charge that Both Religion and Science are Anthropocentric
  • 6.11 How Leopold Ridicules Metaphysical Anthropocentrism
  • 6.12 Leopold's Use of Irony as an Instrument of Ridicule
  • 6.13 Norton's Reading of Leopold as an Anthropocentric Pragmatist
  • 6.14 Ouspensky, Leopold, and "Linguistic Pluralism"-according to Norton
  • 6.15 Leopold's Return to Virtue Ethics
  • 6.16 Leopold's Non-anthropocentric Anthropocentrism
  • 6.17 The Leopold Earth Ethic: A Summary and a Preview
  • 7. The Earth Ethic: A Critical Account of Its Scientific Metaphysical Foundations
  • 7.1 Ouspensky's Metaphysics and the Four-dimensional Space-time Continuum
  • 7.2 Vernadsky's Metaphysics and the Four-dimensional Space-time Continuum: Space
  • 7.3 Vernadsky's Metaphysics and the Four-dimensional Space-time Continuum: Time
  • 7.4 Vernadsky's Doctrine of the Abiogenesis of Life on Earth
  • 7.5 Venadsky's Anti-vitalism
  • 7.6 Vernadsky's Lasting Contribution to Biogeochemistry and Gaian Science
  • 7.7 Teilhard's Concept of the Noosphere
  • 7.8 Vernadsky's Concept of the Noosphere
  • 7.9 Scientific Knowledge as a Planetary Phenomenon
  • 7.10 The Biosphere Crosses the Atlantic
  • 7.11 The Advent of the Gaia Hypothesis
  • 7.12 The Biosphere and Gaia Ecologized
  • 7.13 Vernadsky's Biosphere and Lovelock's Gaia: Similarities and Differences
  • 7.14 Leopold's Living Thing, Vernadsky's Biosphere, and Lovelock's Gaia
  • 7.15 Is the Gaia Hypothesis Necessarily Teleological and Anthropomorphic?
  • 7.16 Varieties of the Earth's Soul or Consciousness
  • 7.17 Personal Speculations on the Earth's Soul or Consciousness
  • 8. The Earth Ethic: A Critical Account of Its Biocentric Deontological Foundations
  • 8.1 Leopold's Biocentric Earth Ethic and the Living Earth
  • 8.2 Gaian Ontology
  • 8.3 Gaian Norms
  • 8.4 Schweitzer's Reverence-for-Life Ethic
  • 8.5 Schweitzer's Reverence-for-Life Ethic Rooted in the Metaphysics of Schopenhauer
  • 8.6 Feinberg's Conativism
  • 8.7 Feinberg's Conativism as a Foundation for a Biocentric Earth Ethic?
  • 8.8 Goodpaster's Biocentrism
  • 8.9 Goodpaster's Holistic Biocentrism as a Foundation for a Biocentric Earth Ethic?
  • 8.10 Feinberg the Tie that Binds Schweitzer and Goodpaster
  • 8.11 Taylor's Individualistic Biocentrism and Regan's Case for Animal Rights
  • 8.12 Taylor's Deontology and Teleological Centers of Life
  • 8.13 Taylor's Biocentrism as a Foundation for a Leopold Earth Ethic?
  • 8.14 Rolston's Biocentrism as a Foundation for a Leopold Earth Ethic?
  • 8.15 Goodpaster's Biocentrism Provides the Best Theoretical Support for a Non-anthropocentric Earth Ethic
  • 9. The Earth Ethic: A Critical Account of Its Anthropocentric Foundations: The Natural Contract and Environmental Virtue Ethics
  • 9.1 No Need to Patronize Gaia with Biocentric Moral Considerability
  • 9.2 The Concept of Anthropocentrism Revisited
  • 9.3 War and Peace
  • 9.4 The Social Contract: The Ancient and Modern Theories
  • 9.5 Du Contrat Social au Contrat Naturel
  • 9.6 War or Peace?
  • 9.7 The French Connection: Larrere
  • 9.8 The French Connection: Latour
  • 9.9 The French-Canadian Connection: Dussault
  • 9.10 Virtue Ethics
  • 9.11 Aristotelian Virtue Ethics
  • 9.12 Environmental Virtue Ethics
  • 9.13 Holistic Virtue Ethics: Self-respecting Crafts
  • 9.14 Holistic Virtue Ethics: The Polis as a Social Whole
  • 9.15 Holistic Virtue Ethics: Nomos versus Phusis
  • 9.16 Holistic Virtue Ethics: Self-respecting Societies
  • 9.17 The Dialectic of Social-Contract Theory and Virtue Ethics
  • 10. The Earth Ethic: A Critical Account of Its Anthropocentric Foundations-The limits of Rational Individualism
  • 10.1 The Year was 1988 and Serres and Jamieson were the First Philosophical Responders
  • 10.2 Jamieson Frames the Theoretical Problem: The Legacy of Smith-and-Jones Ethical Theory
  • 10.3 Jamieson Suggests an Alternative Moral Philosophy-Virtue Ethics
  • 10.4 The Moral Ontology and Logic of Smith-and-Jones Ethical Thinking
  • 10.5 The Essence-and-Accident Moral Ontology of Rational Individualism
  • 10.6 Homo Economicus and Homo Ethicus-Two Sides of the Same Rational Coin
  • 10.7 Saving Rational Individualism: Moral Mathematics
  • 10.8 Saving Rational Individualism: Proximate Ethical Holism
  • 10.9 The Failure of Rational Individualism: Protracted Spatial Scale
  • 10.10 The Failure of Rational Individualism: Protracted Temporal Scale
  • 10.11 The Role of "Theoretical Ineptitude" in Gardiner's Perfect Moral Storm
  • 11. The Earth Ethic: A Critical Account of Its Anthropocentric Foundations-Responsibility to Future Generations and for Global Human Civilization
  • 11.1 Moral Ontology: Relationally Defined and Constituted Moral Beings
  • 11.2 Moral Ontology: Ethical Holism
  • 11.3 Moral Psychology: The Moral Sentiments
  • 11.4 Responsibility to Immediate Posterity
  • 11.5 Responsibility to the Unknown Future Equals Responsibility for Global Human Civilization
  • 11.6 Summary and Conclusion
  • Appendix
  • "Some Fundamentals of Conservation in the Southwest"-by Aldo Leopold
  • Notes
  • Index

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ