The finishing stroke: or, Mr. Ruddiman self-condemned; being a reply to Mr. Ruddiman's Anſwer to (only) Mr. Logan's firſt treatiſe on government. In two parts. The first demonſtrates, that the right of the Kings of Scotland to the crown was not ſtrictly and abſolutely hereditary. Firſt, from the succeſſion of Robert Stewart, to the excluſion of the deſcendents of John Baliol, who had the preferable right. Secondly, from the sucession of Robert Stewart, contrary to the juſt claim of William Earl of Douglas. The second part demonſtrates, that the right of our kings to the crown of Scotland was not ſtrictly and aboſolutely hereditary, from the succeſſion of Robert III. who was begotten out of lawful marriage
著者
書誌事項
The finishing stroke: or, Mr. Ruddiman self-condemned; being a reply to Mr. Ruddiman's Anſwer to (only) Mr. Logan's firſt treatiſe on government. In two parts. The first demonſtrates, that the right of the Kings of Scotland to the crown was not ſtrictly and abſolutely hereditary. Firſt, from the succeſſion of Robert Stewart, to the excluſion of the deſcendents of John Baliol, who had the preferable right. Secondly, from the sucession of Robert Stewart, contrary to the juſt claim of William Earl of Douglas. The second part demonſtrates, that the right of our kings to the crown of Scotland was not ſtrictly and aboſolutely hereditary, from the succeſſion of Robert III. who was begotten out of lawful marriage
Printed by R. Fleming: and ſold by the Bookſellers here, and at glaſgow, 1748
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全1件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
この図書・雑誌をさがす
注記
稀覯書につき記述対象資料毎に書誌レコード作成
Anonymous. By George Logan. Cf. Oxford DNB
A reply to Thomas Ruddiman's 'An answer to the Reverend Mr. George Logan's late Treatise on government'. --ESTC
References: ESTC T183678
References: Oxford DNB
"Corrigenda" at bottom of p. 169
Inscription on front free endpaper: The first part of the reply to Mr Ruddiman is gifted by the Author to Sir John Clark of Penny-cook Baronet, one of the Barons of His Majestie's Exchequer on North Britain
