Freedom and criminal responsibility in American legal thought
著者
書誌事項
Freedom and criminal responsibility in American legal thought
Cambridge University Press, 2014
- : hardback
大学図書館所蔵 全4件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and indexes
HTTP:URL=http://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/54603/cover/9780521854603.jpg Information=Cover image
内容説明・目次
内容説明
As the first full-length study of twentieth-century American legal academics wrestling with the problem of free will versus determinism in the context of criminal responsibility, this book deals with one of the most fundamental problems in criminal law. Thomas Andrew Green chronicles legal academic ideas from the Progressive Era critiques of free will-based (and generally retributive) theories of criminal responsibility to the midcentury acceptance of the idea of free will as necessary to a criminal law conceived of in practical moral-legal terms that need not accord with scientific fact to the late-in-century insistence on the compatibility of scientific determinism with moral and legal responsibility and with a modern version of the retributivism that the Progressives had attacked. Foregrounding scholars' language and ideas, Green invites readers to participate in reconstructing an aspect of the past that is central to attempts to work out bases for moral judgment, legal blame, and criminal punishment.
目次
- Introduction
- Part I. Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in the Age of Pound: 1. The fin de siecle: Speranza
- 2. The Progressive Era: Pound
- 3. Pound eclipsed?: the conversation of the mid to late 1920s
- Part II. Conventional Morality and the Rule of Law: Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in the Forgotten Years, 1930-60: 4. Scientific positivism, utilitarianism, and the wages of conventional morality, 1930-7
- 5. Entr'acte: intimations of freedom, 1937-53
- 6. Durham v. US, the moral context of the law, and reinterpretations of the Progressive inheritance, 1954-8
- Part III. Freedom, Criminal Responsibility, and Retributivism in Late Twentieth-Century Legal Thought: 7. The foundations of neo-retributivism, 1957-76
- 8. Rethinking the freedom question, 1978-94
- 9. Competing perspectives at the close of the twentieth century
- Conclusion.
「Nielsen BookData」 より