Shattered dreams of revolution : from liberty to violence in the late Ottoman Empire
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Shattered dreams of revolution : from liberty to violence in the late Ottoman Empire
Stanford University Press, c2014
- : pbk
Available at / 5 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The Ottoman revolution of 1908 is a study in contradictions-a positive manifestation of modernity intended to reinstate constitutional rule, yet ultimately a negative event that shook the fundamental structures of the empire, opening up ethnic, religious, and political conflicts. Shattered Dreams of Revolution considers this revolutionary event to tell the stories of three important groups: Arabs, Armenians, and Jews. The revolution raised these groups' expectations for new opportunities of inclusion and citizenship. But as post-revolutionary festivities ended, these euphoric feelings soon turned to pessimism and a dramatic rise in ethnic tensions.
The undoing of the revolutionary dreams could be found in the very foundations of the revolution itself. Inherent ambiguities and contradictions in the revolution's goals and the reluctance of both the authors of the revolution and the empire's ethnic groups to come to a compromise regarding the new political framework of the empire ultimately proved untenable. The revolutionaries had never been wholeheartedly committed to constitutionalism, thus constitutionalism failed to create a new understanding of Ottoman citizenship, grant equal rights to all citizens, and bring them under one roof in a legislative assembly. Today as the Middle East experiences another set of revolutions, these early lessons of the Ottoman Empire, of unfulfilled expectations and ensuing discontent, still provide important insights into the contradictions of hope and disillusion seemingly inherent in revolution.
Table of Contents
- Contents and AbstractsShattered Dreams of Revolution: From Liberty to Violence in the Late Ottoman EmpireAuthor(s): Bedross Der MatossianIntroduction chapter abstractThe introduction deals with the historiography of the Young Turk Revolution of 1908 and the novelty that the project brings to the field. It situates the Revolution in the larger context of Global wave of revolutions that took place at the time. Through a macro-historical approach that includes different regions of the Empire, ranging from central to peripheral areas, the book elucidates the complexities of the 1908 Revolution. What is unique about the book is its comparative, inter and intra-communal, and cross-cultural analysis. In order to understand the impact of the Revolution on these three ethnic groups, the second half of the chapter provides a brief historical background of the major transformations that these groups experienced in the nineteenth century. 1The Euphoria of the Revolution chapter abstractChapter one examines one of the most important outcomes of the Young Turk Revolution: the creation of multiple, competing public spheres. It utilizes the concept of cultural history in order to demonstrate how ethnic groups expressed themselves primarily through revolutionary rituals. Thus, applying a subaltern approach, the chapter examines the political culture of the ethnic groups, with a specific focus on symbolic presentation. By using symbolism, space, language, speeches, and revolutionary figures in revolutionary rituals, it provides a new understanding of the national sentiments of the ethnic groups during the beginning of the Second Constitutional Period. 2Debating the Future of the Empire chapter abstractChapter two examines the printed forms of communication in the political public spheres of the postrevolutionary period. The political discourse in the postrevolutionary period created its own rationale, and defined the new era by rejecting the established political beliefs of the ancien regime. Understanding the printed forms of communication provides us with a better understanding of the role of the press in shaping and molding the political discourse among the different ethnic groups. The issues that were debated among the ethnic groups after the postrevolutionary period were essential in determining their policy, identity, and space in the Ottoman Empire. In keeping with the French influence, freedom, equality, and fraternity
- the ancien regime
- and the desired political system were the main contested themes in the political discourse. 3The "Historical Period" and Its Impact on Ethnic Groups chapter abstractChapter three examines the impact of the revolution on the three nondominant groups in the Ottoman Empire. The struggles that were waged within these communities under the rubric of revolution and constitutionalism were shared features with the regional and the global model of revolutions. This chapter illustrates how the Revolution of 1908 became the ultimate opportunity for the empire's different ethnic groups to reform their communal structures and to initiate their own microrevolutions. This was especially evident among the Armenians, Christian Arabs, and the Jews. In the case of the Muslim Arabs, it led to the erosion of the political and social stability due to serious changes in the dynamics of power within the Arab provinces. 4From the Streets to the Ballots chapter abstractChapter four discusses another marginalized topic within the historiography, namely, the ethnic representation in the 1908 elections. Through political participation, mobilization, and lobbying, ethnic groups struggled internally and competed with one another in legitimizing the new political body, the Parliament. The chapter discusses in-depth the phase prior to the balloting, during which intensive negotiations took place among and between the ethnic groups that defined the course of the elections. It analyzes the 1908 elections from the perspective of the expectations of the ethnic groups and their reaction to the outcomes of the elections. Administrative decentralization, ethno-religious privileges, national education, and proportional representation became the key factors in the negotiation processes between the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) and the Armenians, Greeks, and to a certain extent, Jews and Arabs. 5From the Ballots to the Parliament chapter abstractChapter five of the book discusses ethnic politics in the Ottoman Parliament by analyzing the parliamentary debates. The analysis is based on the official transcripts of the fifty-four parliamentary sessions published in Takvim-i Vekayi. The chapter demonstrates that the major issues that became factors in the deterioration of inter-ethnic relationships were at the center of discussions in the parliamentary debates. It analyses in-depth four main issues that preoccupied the ethnic groups in Parliament: the Macedonian Question, concessions to foreign countries, reform in the Anatolian provinces, and restrictions on the right to assembly. 6The Counterrevolution and the "Second Revolution" chapter abstractThe last chapter of the book re-examines the Counterrevolution from the perspective of the nondominant groups and analyses the reaction of the ethnic press. It also discusses the participation of the ethnic groups in quelling the Counter-revolution. After examining the impact of the revolution on the different provinces, it concentrates on the region of Adana where the Counterrevolution led to the massacre of more than twenty thousand Armenians. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the reaction of the ethnic groups to the policies of the CUP that resulted in the Counterrevolution. Conclusion chapter abstractThe book concludes with the argument that the revolutionary dreams of the Empire's nondominant groups were shattered not only by the CUP's authoritarian tendencies, but also by the contradictory dynamics that highlighted the revolutionary and postrevolutionary political processes. The incompatibility of their dreams with those of the CUP and the asymmetries of power that defined their relationship with the Young Turks ensured these disappointments. From their weak position as nondominant groups, they attempted to pressure the CUP into implementing long-awaited reforms and pushed for decentralization. Once they realized that the democratic process and their political visions had been aborted, these groups resorted to mobilizing international powers to exert pressure on the Ottoman government, a kind of interference that the CUP had despised from the day of its inception.
by "Nielsen BookData"
