Nietzsche and Napoleon : the Dionysian conspiracy
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Nietzsche and Napoleon : the Dionysian conspiracy
(Political philosophy now)
University of Wales Press, 2014
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [182]-201) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This book argues that Nietzsche's political thought and his own proposed model of governance is Bonapartist in conception: autocratic will in the guise of popular rule. Bonaparte is the model for the Nietzschean commander; not only his virtu, his ethics of martial valour, but his political institutions and techniques of power. Nietzsche understood that Napoleon manipulated the democratic process, abandoned the concept of popular sovereignty and undermined the principle of equality, that he was opposed to parliamentary politics but maintained their simulacra, a manoeuvre Nietzsche admired in respect of tactics. Nietzsche desired a revaluation of all values which endorsed many features of the Bonapartist regime. One can see Nietzsche not merely situated in the Napoleonic historiography of the cult of personality, but also situated ideologically in terms of a Napoleonic political policy and theory of government, in so far as he affirms certain political structures of the Napoleonic Empire. Nietzsche moves beyond the Napoleonic cult of personality to an analysis of the underlying structures of the Napoleonic empire. Nietzsche admires the 'artist of government' Napoleon (Napoleonic Caesarism) not only for his force of will but also for his political policies and tactics or political techniques.
Contents
Introduction: The Dionysian Conspiracy
1. Sources, Cults and Criticism: Nietzsche’s Portrait of Napoleon
1.) In the Gilded Orbit of the ‘Ideal Artists’
2.) Nietzsche’s Napoleon: Against Thomas Carlyle’s Cult of the Hero
3.) Nietzsche’s Napoleon: A Polemic
4.) The Artist of Government
2. Aristocratic Radicalism as a Species of Bonapartism
1.) From Character-type to Structure
2.) Nietzsche’s Understanding of Bonapartism
3.) Nietzsche and the Underlying Structures of the Bonapartist Empire (1799–1815)
4.) Aristocratic Radicalism
3. Napoleon III: ‘déshonneur’
1.) Caesarism
2.) Nietzsche and the Underlying Structures of the Second Empire (1851–1870)
3.) Nietzsche’s Rejection of Napoleon III
4.) Nietzsche’s Immanent Critique of Bonapartism
5.) Nietzsche’s Radical Bonapartist Alliance
Conclusion: The Imperial European Future
Table of Contents
Introduction: The Dionysian Conspiracy
1. Sources, Cults and Criticism: Nietzsche’s Portrait of Napoleon
1. In the Gilded Orbit of the ‘Ideal Artists’
2. Nietzsche’s Napoleon: Against Thomas Carlyle’s Cult of the Hero
3. Nietzsche’s Napoleon: A Polemic
4. The Artist of Government
2. Aristocratic Radicalism as a Species of Bonapartism
1. From Character-type to Structure
2. Nietzsche’s Understanding of Bonapartism
3. Nietzsche and the Underlying Structures of the Bonapartist Empire (1799–1815)
4. Aristocratic Radicalism
3. Napoleon III: ‘déshonneur’
1. Caesarism
2. Nietzsche and the Underlying Structures of the Second Empire (1851–1870)
3. Nietzsche’s Rejection of Napoleon III
4. Nietzsche’s Immanent Critique of Bonapartism
5. Nietzsche’s Radical Bonapartist Alliance
Conclusion: The Imperial European Future
by "Nielsen BookData"