Framed : America's 51 constitutions and the crisis of governance
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Framed : America's 51 constitutions and the crisis of governance
Oxford University Press, 2013
- : pbk.
- Other Title
-
Framed : America's fifty-one constitutions and the crisis of governance
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
-
Library of Education, National Institute for Educational Policy Research
: pbk.323.63||24151101946
Note
Originally published: c2012
Includes bibliographical references (p. 401-428) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
In his widely acclaimed volume Our Undemocratic Constitution, Sanford Levinson boldly argued that our Constitution should not be treated with "sanctimonious reverence," but as a badly flawed document deserving revision. Now Levinson takes us deeper, asking what were the original assumptions underlying our institutions, and whether we accept those assumptions 225 years later.
In Framed, Levinson challenges our belief that the most important features of our constitutions concern what rights they protect. Instead, he focuses on the fundamental procedures of governance such as congressional bicameralism; the selection of the President by the electoral college, or the dimensions of the President's veto power-not to mention the near impossibility of amending the United States Constitution. These seemingly "settled" and "hardwired" structures contribute to the
now almost universally recognized "dysfunctionality" of American politics.
Levinson argues that we should stop treating the United States Constitution as uniquely exemplifying the American constitutional tradition. We should be aware of the 50 state constitutions, often interestingly different-and perhaps better-than the national model. Many states have updated their constitutions by frequent amendment or by complete replacement via state constitutional conventions. California's ungovernable condition has prompted serious calls for a constitutional convention. This
constant churn indicates that basic law often reaches the point where it fails and becomes obsolete. Given the experience of so many states, he writes, surely it is reasonable to believe that the U.S. Constitution merits its own updating.
Whether we are concerned about making America more genuinely democratic or only about creating a system of government that can more effectively respond to contemporary challenges, we must confront the ways our constitutions, especially the United States Constitution, must be changed in fundamental ways.
Table of Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Of Compromise and Constitutions
- 3 What is the pint of preambles?
- 4 How does a <"Republican Form of Government>" differ from <"Democracy>"?
- 5 Elections and a Republican form of government
- 6 Bicameralism
- 7 If two opinions are good, is a third opinion (with the power of most of the time absolutely to kill the decision of the first two opinion-makers) even better?
- 8 Presidentialism (and <"gubernatorialism>")
- 9 So what, precisely, does one get, as a constitutional matter, upon being elected president?
- 10 Presidential duration in office, the possibility of impeachment, and the role of the vice president
- 11 Divided government
- 12 How <"independent>" a judiciary do we really want?
- 13 On the judiciary (and Supreme Court) as guardian of the Constitution
- 14 Federalism
- 15 Amendment
- 16 Emergency Powers
- 17 Conclusion
- Notes
- Index
by "Nielsen BookData"