Divine causality and human free choice : Domingo Báñez, physical premotion and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited
著者
書誌事項
Divine causality and human free choice : Domingo Báñez, physical premotion and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited
（Brill's studies in intellectual history, v. 252）
Brill, c2016
- : hardback
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全3件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 325-346) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In Divine Causality and Human Free Choice, R.J. Matava explains the idea of physical premotion defended by Domingo Banez, whose position in the Controversy de Auxiliis has been typically ignored in contemporary discussions of providence and freewill. Through a close engagement with untranslated primary texts, Matava shows Banez's relevance to recent debates about middle knowledge. Finding the mutual critiques of Banez and Molina convincing, Matava argues that common presuppositions led both parties into an insoluble dilemma. However, Matava also challenges the informal consensus that Lonergan definitively resolved the controversy. Developing a position independently advanced by several recent scholars, Matava explains how the doctrine of creation entails a position that is more satisfactory both philosophically and as a reading of Aquinas.
目次
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABBREVIATIONS
PROLOGUE
1. Framing the question
2. The aim and scope of this study
3. Rationale
4. The form of this study
CHAPTER ONE
An Historical Introduction to the Controversy de Auxiliis
1. The first period: Open scholarly engagement (1582-1594)
2. The second period: Papal intervention and the Congregatio de Auxiliis (1594-1607)
3. Resurgences
CHAPTER TWO
Domingo Banez on Divine Causality and Human Free Choice
1. Divine art: The idea of physical premotion
2. Banez on free choice
3. Human freedom, physical premotion and sin
4. Conclusion
CHAPTER THREE
Domingo Banez's Critique of Molina
1. Molina's teaching on free choice, divine causality and providence
2. A survey and condensation of Banez's critique of Molinism
3. Banez's critique of Molina's doctrine of free choice and divine causality
4. Banez's critique of middle knowledge
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER THREE
Do the limitations of correspondence-type truth theories undermine the grounding objection?
1. The position of Trenton Merricks
2. Does Merricks's position undercut the grounding objection?
CHAPTER FOUR
Luis de Molina's Critique of Banez
1. The historical context of Molina's condemnation of Banez
2. The central issue of dispute: Banez's view on the efficacy of divine causality
3. Three problematic outworkings of Banez's view on the efficacy of divine causality
4. The root of the problem: God predetermines all human actions
5. Conclusion
CHAPTER FIVE
Physical Premotion or Aristotelian Premotion? The Proposal of Bernard Lonergan
1. Lonergan's critique of Banez
2. Lonergan's interpretation of Aquinas
3. A constructive critique of Lonergan's interpretation
4. Conclusion
CHAPTER SIX
Creation, Causal Priority and Human Freedom: Revisiting Thomas Aquinas
1. The thesis that Aquinas understands God's motion of the human will as an exercise of God's creative causality
2. A textual argument for understanding God's motion of the human will as an exercise of his creative causality
3. Aquinas on the status of God's creative action: An exposition of ST I q. 45 a. 3
4. Conclusion
CHAPTER SEVEN
God Creates Human Free Choices: An Explanation and Defense
1. Literary origins of the view
2. What it means to say human acts of free choice are created by God
3. Five potential objections briefly considered
4. A Suarezian objection and counterproposal: Divine concurrence revisited
5. Conclusion
EPILOGUE
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
INDEX
「Nielsen BookData」 より