Divine causality and human free choice : Domingo Báñez, physical premotion and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited
著者
書誌事項
Divine causality and human free choice : Domingo Báñez, physical premotion and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited
(Brill's studies in intellectual history, v. 252)
Brill, c2016
- : hardback
大学図書館所蔵 全3件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 325-346) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
In Divine Causality and Human Free Choice, R.J. Matava explains the idea of physical premotion defended by Domingo Banez, whose position in the Controversy de Auxiliis has been typically ignored in contemporary discussions of providence and freewill. Through a close engagement with untranslated primary texts, Matava shows Banez's relevance to recent debates about middle knowledge. Finding the mutual critiques of Banez and Molina convincing, Matava argues that common presuppositions led both parties into an insoluble dilemma. However, Matava also challenges the informal consensus that Lonergan definitively resolved the controversy. Developing a position independently advanced by several recent scholars, Matava explains how the doctrine of creation entails a position that is more satisfactory both philosophically and as a reading of Aquinas.
目次
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABBREVIATIONS
PROLOGUE
1. Framing the question
2. The aim and scope of this study
3. Rationale
4. The form of this study
CHAPTER ONE
An Historical Introduction to the Controversy de Auxiliis
1. The first period: Open scholarly engagement (1582-1594)
2. The second period: Papal intervention and the Congregatio de Auxiliis (1594-1607)
3. Resurgences
CHAPTER TWO
Domingo Banez on Divine Causality and Human Free Choice
1. Divine art: The idea of physical premotion
2. Banez on free choice
3. Human freedom, physical premotion and sin
4. Conclusion
CHAPTER THREE
Domingo Banez's Critique of Molina
1. Molina's teaching on free choice, divine causality and providence
2. A survey and condensation of Banez's critique of Molinism
3. Banez's critique of Molina's doctrine of free choice and divine causality
4. Banez's critique of middle knowledge
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER THREE
Do the limitations of correspondence-type truth theories undermine the grounding objection?
1. The position of Trenton Merricks
2. Does Merricks's position undercut the grounding objection?
CHAPTER FOUR
Luis de Molina's Critique of Banez
1. The historical context of Molina's condemnation of Banez
2. The central issue of dispute: Banez's view on the efficacy of divine causality
3. Three problematic outworkings of Banez's view on the efficacy of divine causality
4. The root of the problem: God predetermines all human actions
5. Conclusion
CHAPTER FIVE
Physical Premotion or Aristotelian Premotion? The Proposal of Bernard Lonergan
1. Lonergan's critique of Banez
2. Lonergan's interpretation of Aquinas
3. A constructive critique of Lonergan's interpretation
4. Conclusion
CHAPTER SIX
Creation, Causal Priority and Human Freedom: Revisiting Thomas Aquinas
1. The thesis that Aquinas understands God's motion of the human will as an exercise of God's creative causality
2. A textual argument for understanding God's motion of the human will as an exercise of his creative causality
3. Aquinas on the status of God's creative action: An exposition of ST I q. 45 a. 3
4. Conclusion
CHAPTER SEVEN
God Creates Human Free Choices: An Explanation and Defense
1. Literary origins of the view
2. What it means to say human acts of free choice are created by God
3. Five potential objections briefly considered
4. A Suarezian objection and counterproposal: Divine concurrence revisited
5. Conclusion
EPILOGUE
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY
INDEX
「Nielsen BookData」 より