Re-producing Chineseness in Southeast Asia : scholarship and identity in comparative perspectives
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Re-producing Chineseness in Southeast Asia : scholarship and identity in comparative perspectives
Routledge, 2016
Available at 3 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Identity politics can impede Chinese identification in southeast Asia because the migrant population, particularly the intellectual aspect of that population, have to consider the political effects of their intellectual and social activities on the survival of Chinese communities. Similarly, these communities have to deal with the necessity of nation-building in the aftermath of the Second World War, which required integration rather than the exaggeration of differences. Consequently, restriction on self-understanding as well as self-representation has become more than apparent in Chinese migrant communities in southeast Asia.
With this in mind, identity politics can inspire self-understanding among the migrant communities, as intellectuals rediscover how humanism can enable a claim of 'Chineseness' that can be registered differently and creatively in a variety of national conditions. Migrant communities generally understand the importance of political accuracy, and this being accurate involves subscribing to pragmatism, something which is apparent in the scholarship and creative outputs of these communities. Humanism and pragmatism together are the epistemological parameters of self-representation, whereas civilizational and ethnic studies are their methodological parameters. This book was originally published as a special issue of Asian Ethnicity.
Table of Contents
Introduction: the beauty of being accurate 1. Producing and reconstructing knowledge on China in Singapore: perspectives from the academics and mass media 2. Rewriting Singapore and rewriting Chineseness: Lee Guan Kin's diasporic stance 3. Between a subject and an object: representation of China in Kuo Pao-kun's Singapore and Denny Yung's Hong Kong 4. Intellectual paths of Thailand's first generation China scholars: a research note on encountering and choices of Khien Theeravit and Sarasin Viraphol 5. Looking beyond ethnicity: the negotiation of Chinese Muslim identity in Penang, Malaysia 6. Patrolling Chineseness: Singapore's Kowloon Club and the ethnic adaptation of Hong Kongese to Singaporean society
by "Nielsen BookData"