Grammatical complexity in academic English : linguistic change in writing
著者
書誌事項
Grammatical complexity in academic English : linguistic change in writing
(Studies in English language)
Cambridge University Press, 2016
- : hardback
大学図書館所蔵 全25件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 257-271) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Grammatical Complexity in Academic English uses corpus-based analyses to challenge a number of dominant stereotypes and assumptions within linguistics. Biber and Gray tackle the nature of grammatical complexity, demonstrating that embedded phrasal structures are as important as embedded dependent clauses. The authors also overturn ingrained assumptions about linguistic change, showing that grammatical change occurs in writing as well as speech. This work establishes that academic writing is structurally compressed (rather than elaborated); that it is often not explicit in the expression of meaning; and that scientific academic writing has been the locus of some of the most important grammatical changes in English over the past 200 years (rather than being conservative and resistant to change). Supported throughout with textual evidence, this work is essential reading for discourse analysts, sociolinguists, and applied linguists, as well as descriptive linguists and historical linguists.
目次
- 1. Academic writing: challenging the stereotypes
- 2. Using corpora to analyze grammatical change
- 3. Phrasal versus clausal discourse styles: a synchronic grammatical description of academic writing contrasted with other registers
- 4. The historical evolution of phrasal discourse styles in academic writing
- 5. The functional extension of phrasal grammatical features in academic writing
- 6. The loss of explicitness in academic research writing
- 7. Conclusion.
「Nielsen BookData」 より