Hubris, self-interest, and America's failed war in Afghanistan : the self-sustaining overreach
著者
書誌事項
Hubris, self-interest, and America's failed war in Afghanistan : the self-sustaining overreach
Lexington Boooks, c2015
- : cloth
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全2件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 295-315) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This book describes the conduct of the US-led post-9/11 war in Afghanistan. Adopting a long-term perspective, it argues that even though Washington initially had an opportunity to achieve its security goals and give Afghanistan a chance to enter a new era, it compromised any possibility of success from the very moment it let bin Laden escape to Pakistan in December 2001, and found itself locked in a strategic overreach.
Given the bureaucratic and rhetorical momentum triggered by the war on terror in America, the Bush Administration was bound to deploy more resources in Afghanistan sooner or later (despite its focus on Iraq). The need to satisfy unfulfilled counter-terrorism objectives made the US dependent on Afghanistan's warlords, which compromised the country's stability and tarnished its new political system. The extension of the US military presence made Washington lose its leverage on the Pakistan army leaders, who, aware of America's logistical dependency on Islamabad, supported the Afghan insurgents - their historical proxies - more and more openly. The extension of the war also contributed to radicalize segments of the Afghan and Pakistani populations, destabilizing the area further.
In the meantime, the need to justify the extension of its military presence influenced the US-led coalition into proclaiming its determination to democratize and reconstruct Afghanistan. While highly opportunistic, the emergence of these policies proved both self-defeating and unsustainable due to an inescapable collision between the US-led coalition's inherent self-interest, hubris, limited knowledge, limited attention span and limited resources, and, on the other hand, Afghanistan's inherent complexity. As the critical contradictions at the very heart of the campaign increased with the extension of the latter's duration, scale, and cost, America's leaders, entrapped in path-dependence, lost their strategic flexibility. Despite debates on troops/resource allocation and more sophisticated doctrines, they repeated the same structural mistakes over and over again. The strategic overreach became self-sustaining, until its costs became intolerable, leading to a drawdown which has more to do with a pervasive sense of failure than with the accomplishment of any noble purpose or strategic breakthrough.
目次
Introduction
PART I: THE STRUCTURAL WEIGHT OF REALISM: FOREIGN SECURITY INTERESTS AND THE US ENTANGLEMENT IN AFGHANISTAN
Chapter 1: US Cold War and Post-Cold War Policy: A Volatile and Security-Driven Interest for the Afghan Pawn
Chapter 2: Operation Enduring Freedom: A Campaign in Search for Strategic Coherence?
Chapter 3: Pouring the US-Led Coalition's Resources in a Bottomless Pit: Pakistan's Predictable Double Game
PART II: TOWARDS SELF-SUSTAINING OVERREACH: GRANDIOSE PROJECTS, STRUCTURAL AMBIGUITIES, AND QUESTIONABLE SUSTAINABILITY:
Chapter 4: The Promises and Profound Ambiguities of the US-Led Coalition's Democratization Agenda
Chapter 5: The Promises and Profound Ambiguities of the US-Led Reconstruction and State-Building
Chapter 6: The Price of Intractable Contradictions: A Seemingly Unending Security Degradation
PART III: THE OBAMA ERA: A FINAL SHOWDOWN TO SECURE A "DECENT INTERVAL"?
Chapter 7: The Obama Era: New Intentions, Same Old Strategic Horizon
Chapter 8: The Surge: Disappointing Results and Unaltered Path to Withdrawal
Chapter 9: Afghanistan in 2014: Betrayed Promises?
Conclusion
「Nielsen BookData」 より