Instructional practices with and without empirical validity
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Instructional practices with and without empirical validity
(Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities : a research annual, v. 29)(Emerald books)
Emerald, 2016
Available at 7 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Description and Table of Contents
Description
It is important that stakeholders are aware of practices supported as effective for students with learning and behavioral disabilities in order to provide instruction that results in improved learner outcomes. Perhaps equally important, stakeholders should also know which practices have been shown by research to be ineffective (e.g., have no, small, or inconsistent effects on learner outcomes). Special education has a long history of using practices that, though appealing in some ways, have little or no positive impact on learner outcomes. In order to bridge the gap between research and practice, educators must be aware of which practices work (and prioritize their use) and which do not (and avoid their use). In this volume, each chapter describes two practices one supported as effective by research and one shown by research to be ineffective in critical areas of education for students with learning and behavioral disabilities. Chapter authors will provide readers guidance in how to do this for each effective practices and provide concrete reasons to not do this for each ineffective practice.
Table of Contents
1. Instructional Practices with and Without Empirical Validity: An Introduction - Bryan G. Cook, Melody Tankersley and Timothy J. Landrum
2. Two Approaches for Improving Reading Fluency: Research Supports Repeated Reading But Not Colored Filters - Bryan G. Cook and Christina Keaulana
3. Developing Mathematical Problem Solving Through Strategic Instruction: Much More Than a Keyword - Paul J. Riccomini, Jiwon Hwang and Stephanie Morano
4. Effective and Ineffective Writing Practices for Students with Disabilities - Amy Gillespie Rouse and Alyson A. Collins
5. Picture Exchange Communication System and Facilitated Communication: Contrasting an Evidence-Based Practice with a Discredited Method - Jason C. Travers, Matt Tincani, Julie L. Thompson and Richard L. Simpson
6. Movement as Behavioral Moderator: What Does the Research Say? - Amy E. Ruhaak and Bryan G. Cook
7. Learning Styles, Learning Preferences, and Student Choice: Implications for Teaching - Timothy J. Landrum and Kimberly M. Landrum
8. Never Say Never: The Appropriate and Inappropriate Use of Praise and Feedback for Students with Learning and Behavioral Disabilities - Lauren W. Collins and Lysandra Cook
9. Do School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, Not Exclusionary Discipline Practices - Rhonda N. T. Nese and Kent McIntosh
10. Deep Pressure Therapy Doesn't Reduce Stereotypical Behavior, Function-Based Interventions Do Mickey Losinski and Robin Parks Ennis
by "Nielsen BookData"