Scrutinizing argumentation in practice
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Scrutinizing argumentation in practice
（Argumentation in context / editors Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, v. 9）
John Benjamins, c2015
- : hb
Available at 2 libraries
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice contains a selection of papers reflecting upon the use of argumentation in real life contexts. The first five sections are devoted to argumentation in a specific institutional context: scientific controversies, argumentation in politics, argumentation in a legal context, argumentation in education, argumentation in an interpersonal context. The last section deals with strategic maneuvering as a vital concept in studying argumentation in practice.
The contributors are: Francesco Arcidiacono, Michael J. Baker, Sarah Bigi, Marina Bletsas, Stephanie Breux, William O. Dailey, Marianne Doury, Claudio Duran, Frans H. van Eemeren, Lindsay M. Ellis, Jeanne Fahnestock, Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, Anca Gata, Salma I. Ghanem, Sara Greco, Edward A. Hinck, Robert S. Hinck, Shelly S. Hinck, Henrike Jansen, Takayuki Kato, Susan L. Kline, Pascale Mansier, Bert Meuffels, Celine Miserez-Caperos, D'Arcy Oaks, Sachinidou Paraskevi, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, H. Jose Plug, Takeshi Suzuki, and David Zarefsky.
Table of Contents
- 1. Foreword
- 2. A general perspective applied to scientific controversies
- 3. Arguing in the grooves: Genre and language constraints in scientific controversies (by Fahnestock, Jeanne)
- 4. Argumentation in a political context
- 5. Cultural differences in political debate: Comparing face threats in U.S., Great Britain, and Egyptian Campaign Debates (by Hinck, Edward A.)
- 6. The September 11, 1973 military coup in Chile and the military regime 1973-1990: A case of social and political deep disagreement (by Duran, Claudio)
- 7. Argumentation in Lincoln's Gettysburg Address (by Zarefsky, David)
- 8. Argumentation in a legal context
- 9. The voices of justice. Argumentative polyphony and strategic manoeuvring in judgement motivations: An example from the Italian Constitutional Court (by Bletsas, Marina)
- 10. A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions (by Feteris, Eveline T.)
- 11. Transparency in legal argumentation: Adapting to a composite audience in administrative judicial decisions (by Plug, H. Jose)
- 12. Argumentation in education
- 13. Knowledge-oriented argumentation in children (by Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly)
- 14. Argumentative strategies in adolescents' school writing: One aspect of the evaluation of students' written argumentative competence (by Sachinidou, Paraskevi)
- 15. The integration of pragma-dialectics and collaborative learning research: Dialogue, externalisation and collective thinking (by Baker, Michael J.)
- 16. A critique of the ubiquity of the Toulmin model in argumentative writing instruction in the U.S.A. (by Ellis, Lindsay M.)
- 17. Argumentation in an interpersonal context
- 18. The psychiatrization of the opponent in polemical context (by Doury, Marianne)
- 19. The effect of interpersonal familiarity on argument in online discussions (by Kline, Susan L.)
- 20. "I did not do it, because I would not do it": Defending oneself against an accusation (by Jansen, Henrike)
- 21. Argumentation from analogy in migrants' decisions (by Greco Morasso, Sara)
- 22. Can argumentation skills become a therapeutic resource?: Results from an observational study in diabetes care (by Bigi, Sarah)
- 23. Strategic maneuvering
- 24. The strategic function of argumentative moves in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports (by Gata, Anca)
- 25. The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats (by Eemeren, Frans H. van)
- 26. A strategic maneuvering analysis of Japan's first internet election in 2013 (by Kato, Takayuki)
- 27. Index
by "Nielsen BookData"