Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus-linguistic research
著者
書誌事項
Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus-linguistic research
(Routledge advances in corpus linguistics / edited by Anthony McEnery and Michael Hoey, 17)
Routledge, 2016
- : hbk
- : pbk
並立書誌 全1件
大学図書館所蔵 全10件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Contemporary corpus linguists use a wide variety of methods to study discourse patterns. This volume provides a systematic comparison of various methodological approaches in corpus linguistics through a series of parallel empirical studies that use a single corpus dataset to answer the same overarching research question. Ten contributing experts each use a different method to address the same broadly framed research question: In what ways does language use in online Q+A forum responses differ across four world English varieties (India, Philippines, United Kingdom, and United States)? Contributions will be based on analysis of the same 400,000 word corpus from online Q+A forums, and contributors employ methodologies including corpus-based discourse analysis, audience perceptions, Multi-Dimensional analysis, pragmatic analysis, and keyword analysis.
In their introductory and concluding chapters, the volume editors compare and contrast the findings from each method and assess the degree to which 'triangulating' multiple approaches may provide a more nuanced understanding of a research question, with the aim of identifying a set of complementary approaches which could arguably take into account analytical blind spots. Baker and Egbert also consider the importance of issues such as researcher subjectivity, type of annotation, the limitations and affordances of different corpus tools, the relative strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches, and the value of considering data or information beyond the corpus. Rather than attempting to find the 'best' approach, the focus of the volume is on how different corpus linguistic methodologies may complement one another, and raises suggestions for further methodological studies which use triangulation to enrich corpus-related research.
目次
I. Introduction 1. Introduction Paul Baker 2. The Corpus of Q+A Forums Jesse Egbert II. Empirical Studies 3. Keyword Analysis Tony McEnery 4. Semantic Domains Amanda Potts 5. Keywords, word sketches, sketch differences Adam Kilgariff 6. Lexical Bundles Bethany Gray 7. Multifactorial approaches to variation in lexis/syntax Stefan Gries 8. Multi-Dimensional Analysis Eric Friginal & Douglas Biber 9. Stylistic Perception Analysis Jesse Egbert 10. Evaluation Susan Hunston 11. Pragmatics Jonathon Culpeper & Claire Hardaker 12. Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis of Gendered Discourses Paul Baker III. Methodological Triangulation 13. Methodological Triangulation: What Do We Learn about Q+A Forums? Paul Baker & Jesse Egbert 14. The Future of Methodological Triangulation in Corpus Analysis Jesse Egbert & Paul Baker
「Nielsen BookData」 より