Deceptive ambiguity by police and prosecutors
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Deceptive ambiguity by police and prosecutors
（Oxford studies in language and law / Roger W. Shuy, series editor）
Oxford University Press, c2017
Available at / 4 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Much has been written about how criminal suspects, defendants, and the targets of undercover operations employ ambiguous language as they interact with the legal system. This book examines the other side of the coin, describing fifteen criminal investigations that demonstrate how police, prosecutors, and undercover agents use deceptive ambiguity with their subjects and targets, thereby creating misrepresentations through their uses of speech events, schemas, agendas,
speech acts, lexicon, and grammar. This misrepresentation also can strongly affect the perceptions of later listeners, such as judges and juries, about the subjects' motives, predispositions, intentions, and voluntariness.
Deception is commonly considered intentional while ambiguity is often excused as unintentional, in line with Grice's maxim of sincerity in his cooperative principle. Most of the interactions of suspects, defendants, and targets with representatives of law enforcement, however, are oppositional, adversarial, and non-cooperative events that provide the opportunity for participants to stretch, ignore, or even violate the cooperative principle. One effective way law enforcement does this is by
using ambiguity. Suspects and defendants may hear such ambiguous speech and not recognize the ambiguity and therefore react in ways that they may not have understood or intended. The fifteen case studies in this book illustrate how deceptive ambiguity, whether intentional or not, is used as commonly by
police, prosecutors and undercover agents as it is by suspects and defendants.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Power, ambiguity, and deception
3. Police interviewers use deceptive ambiguity
4. Prosecutors use deceptive ambiguity
5. Undercover agents use deceptive ambiguity
6. Cooperating witnesses use deceptive ambiguity
7. Complainants use deceptive ambiguity
8. Deceptive ambiguity in the language elements
9. The effects, frequency, and power of the government's
uses of deceptive ambiguity in criminal investigations
Appendix A: Deceptive ambiguity created by socio-cultural differences
References
by "Nielsen BookData"