Contingent valuation of environmental goods : a comprehensive critique
著者
書誌事項
Contingent valuation of environmental goods : a comprehensive critique
Edward Elgar Publishing, c2017
大学図書館所蔵 全3件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Contingent valuation is a survey-based procedure that attempts to estimate how much households are willing to pay for specific programs that improve the environment or prevent environmental degradation. For decades, the method has been the center of debate regarding its reliability: does it really measure the value that people place on environmental changes? Bringing together leading voices in the field, this timely book tells a unified story about the interrelated features of contingent valuation and how those features affect its reliability. Through empirical analysis and review of past studies, the authors identify important deficiencies in the procedure, raising questions about the technique's continued use.
Individual chapters investigate how respondents answer questions in contingent valuation surveys, with a particular focus on how the procedure's estimates change based on the costs that the researcher specifies, the payment mechanism, and the scope of the environmental improvement. Other issues covered include whether the survey respondents make trade-offs between the program costs and benefits; and whether corrections can be applied to account for any misunderstanding of the questions by respondents and for the hypothetical nature of the survey.
This book will appeal to environmental economists and students in environmental and resource economics. Government staff at environmental agencies and survey researchers will benefit from the close analysis of previous applications.
Contributors include: J. Burrows, H.M. Chan, L. Daniel, W. Desvousges, P. Dixon, H.Foster, J. Genser, B. Israel, M. Kemp, E. Leamer, J. Lustig, D. McFadden, D. MacNair, J. Martin, K. Mathews, K. Myers, R. Newman, G. Parsons, J. Plewes, J. Schneider, K. Smith Fayne, T. Tomasi, K. Train
目次
Contents:
Introduction
Daniel McFadden and Kenneth Train
1. Response to cost prompts in stated preference valuation of environmental goods
James Burrows, Powell Dixon and Hiu Man Chan
2. Fat tails and truncated bids in contingent valuation: an application to an endangered shorebird species
George Parsons and Kelley Myers
3. Inadequate response to frequency of payments in contingent valuation of environmental goods
Kelley Myers, George Parsons, and Kenneth Train
4. An adding-up test on contingent valuations of river and lake quality
William Desvousges, Kristy Mathews and Kenneth Train
5. Do contingent valuation estimates of willingness to pay for non-use environmental goods pass the scope test with adequacy? A review of the evidence from empirical studies in the literature
James Burrows, Rebecca Newman, Jerry Genser and Jeffrey Plewes
6. Stated preference methods and their applicability to environmental use and non-use valuations
Daniel McFadden
7. Some findings from further exploration of the "composite good" approach to contingent valuation
Michael Kemp, Edward Leamer, James Burrows and Powell Dixon
8. Inferences from stated preference surveys when some respondents do not compare costs and benefits
Edward Leamer and Josh Lustig
9. Assessing the validity of stated preference data using follow-up questions
Kelley Myers, Doug MacNair, Ted Tomasi and Jude Schneider
10. Hypothetical bias: a new meta-analysis
Harry Foster and James Burrows
11. Legal obstacles for contingent valuation methods in environmental litigation
Brian D. Israel, Jean Martin, Kelly Smith Fayne, and Lauren Daniel
Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より