Joining the Non-Proliferation Treaty : deterrence, non-proliferation and the American alliance
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Joining the Non-Proliferation Treaty : deterrence, non-proliferation and the American alliance
(Routledge advances in international relations and politics)
Routledge, 2019
- : hbk
Available at 16 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
What were the calculations made by the US and its major allies in the 1960s when they faced the signing of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)? These were all states with the technological and financial capabilities to develop and possess nuclear weapons should they wish to do so. In the end, only the United Kingdom and France became nuclear weapon states. Eventually, all of them joined the non-proliferation regime.
Leading American, British, Canadian, French, German and Japanese scholars consider key questions that faced the signatories to the NPT:
How imperative was nuclear deterrence in facing the perceived threat to their country?
How reliable did they think the US extended deterrence was, and how costly would an independent deterrent be both financially and politically?
Was there a regional option?
How much future was there in the civilian nuclear energy sector for their country and what role would the NPT play in this area?
What capabilities needed to be preserved for the country's future and how could this be made compatible with the NPT?
What were the determining factors of deciding whether to join the NPT?
Table of Contents
List of contributors
Introduction (Yoko Iwama)
Part I
1. Nuclear Proliferation and Conceptions of National Interest: The U.S. Case, 1960-1967 (William Burr)
2. After the Hegemony of the "Atoms for Peace" Programmeme: Multilateral Non-proliferation Policy under the Nixon and Ford Administrations (Shinsuke TOMOTSUGU)
Part II
3. Britain, the Deterrence/Non-Proliferation Dilemma and the NPT (John Baylis)
4. France's Relationship to the NATO defense strategy and the Western non-Proliferation Regime (Dominique MONGIN)
5. Problem Solved? The German Nuclear Question and West Germany's Accession to the NPT (1967-1975) (Andreas Lutsch)
6. Canada's Affair with Nuclear Weapons: Building, Debating, Acquiring, Retiring (Don Munton)
Part III
7. Japan's Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Diplomacy during the Cold War: The Myth and Reality of a Nuclear Bombed Country (Akira KUROSAKI)
8. The Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Decision to Join the Non-Proliferation Treaty (Yoko Iwama)
9. In the Shadow of China's Bomb: Nuclear Consultation, Commitment Reconfirmation, and Missile Defence in the U.S.-Japan Alliance, 1962-68 (Shingo Yoshida)
10. Conclusion (John Baylis)
Index
by "Nielsen BookData"