Knowledge and acknowledgement in the politics of memory of the Armenian genocide
著者
書誌事項
Knowledge and acknowledgement in the politics of memory of the Armenian genocide
(Mass violence in modern history, 1)
Routledge, 2019
- : hbk
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [271]-299) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Is the Armenian Genocide a strictly historical matter? If that is the case, why is it still a topical issue, capable of causing diplomatic rows and heated debates? The short answer would be that the century old Armenian Genocide is much more than a historical question. It emerged as a political dilemma on the international arena at the San Stefano peace conference in 1878 and has remained as such into our days. The disparity between knowledge and acknowledgement, mainly ascribable to Turkey's official denial of the genocide, has only heightened the politicization of the Armenian question. Thus, the memories of the WWI era refuse to be relegated to the pages of history but are rather perceived as a vivid presence. This is the result of the perpetual process of politics of memory.
The politics of memory is an intricate and interdisciplinary negotiation, engaging many different actors in the society who have access to a wide range of resources and measures in order to achieve their goals. By following the Armenian question during the past century up to its Centennial Commemoration in 2015, this study aims to explain why and how the politics of memory of the Armenian Genocide has kept it as a topical issue in our days.
目次
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- The Vitality of the Armenian Genocide: Why is it Still Topical?
- Genocide Studies: A True Interdisciplinary Field and its Challenges
- Politics of Memory: An Intricate Perpetual Process
- Politics of Memory Explained through its Constituent Parts
- Memory and History in the Politics of Memory
- Creating National Narrative and Identity
- Molding the Memory by Forgetting
- The Reciprocal Relation between Democracy and Memory
- Education: An Example of Auxiliary Means in Politics of Memory
- The Central Role of Law and Justice
- Reconciliation: Synthesis of Recognition, Responsibility and Reparation
- Existing Research
- Outline and Delimitations
- The Armenian Question between History and Politics
- The Entry of the Armenian Question into the International Arena
- Beacons of Hope and Justice: The Sevres Treaty
- From Sevres to Lausanne: Realpolitik Reigns Supreme
- Genocide in International Law: Nuremberg and the UN Convention
- The Turkish Genocide Denial during the Interwar Period
- The Reawakening: The 50th Commemoration Day on April 24, 1965
- The Resonance: The Diaspora as Agent of Remembrance and Recognition
- The Rediscovery of the Suppressed Genocide
- The Igniting Spark: The Genocide Survivor Gourgen Yanikian
- The First UN Genocide Study: The Ruhashyankiko Report, 1979
- The Iron Ladle: Armed Terrorism as Political Leverage
- The Entry into the Academia
- Which Memory to Preserve: The US Holocaust Memorial Museum
- Hearing the Neglected Victim: The Permanent Peoples' Tribunal, 1984
- The UN Genocide Convention Revisited: The Whitaker Report, 1985
- The Pinnacle of the Recognition Process: European Parliament, 1987
- Memory, History and Justice: Towards Reconciliation
- The Karabakh Conflict: The Legacy Turned Catalyst for Independence
- Independence and the Genocide as Rule Setter
- Armenian-Turkish Relations and the Old Ghost of Genocide
- Parliamentary Recognitions: Writing History or Confirming the Research?
- Legal Examination: Law and Politics
- The Unforgotten Genocide: The Centennial Commemoration, 2015
- Knowledge and (Dis)Acknowledgement: A Century of the Politics of Memory of the Armenian Genocide
- Bibliography
- Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より