Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity : in the aftermath of plagiarism
著者
書誌事項
Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity : in the aftermath of plagiarism
（Research ethics forum, v. 6）
Springer, c2018
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全1件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. If untreated, academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. By providing case studies from the field of philosophy and related disciplines, the volume exhibits that current post-publication responses to academic plagiarism are insufficient. It catalogues how humanities disciplines fall short in comparison with the natural and biomedical sciences for ensuring the integrity of the body of published research. This volume provides clarity about how to conceptualize the scholarly record, surveys the traditional methods for correcting it, and argues for new interventions to improve the reliability of the body of published research. The book is valuable not only to those in the field of philosophy and other humanities disciplines, but also to those interested in research ethics, meta-science, and the sociology of research.
目次
Preface
IntroductionCorrecting the Scholarly Record
The Integrity of AuthorshipPre-Publication and Post-Publication Responses to PlagiarismThe Purpose of Academic PublishingA Precis of ChaptersReferences
1. Defining the Scholarly Record1.1 The Limits of the Scholarly Record1.1.1 The Knowledge Condition1.1.2 The Authorship Condition1.1.3 The Publication Condition1.1.4 The Library and the Database Conditions1.1.5 The Discipline Condition1.2 Works at the Margin of the Scholarly Record1.3 The Scholarly Record in Transition1.4 The Identity of Items of the Scholarly Record1.5 A Definable Scholarly RecordReferences
2. What is Academic Plagiarism?2.1 2.1. Identifying Academic Plagiarism2.1.1 Appropriation2.1.2 Non-Triviality2.1.3 Inadequate Credit2.1.4 An Appearance of Original Authorship2.1.5 A Discrete Item of the Scholarly Record2.2 The Intent to Plagiarize2.3 Self-Plagiarism2.4 Euphemisms for Academic Plagiarism2.5 Plagiarism vs. Copyright Infringement2.6 Statutes of Limitation for Plagiarism2.7 In SumReferences
3. A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy3.1 Classifying Responses to Plagiarism3.2 Issuing a Statement of Concern3.3 Issuing a Statement of Retraction (SR)3.3.1 Maximal and Minimal Statements of Retraction3.3.2 Paywalled SRs and Untethered SRs3.3.3 SRs with University Support3.3.4 Academic Editors and Independent SRs3.3.5 Problems with Minimal and Medial SRs3.4 Reprinting a Volume After the Removal of Plagiarized Material3.5 Halting the Sale of the Plagiarized Material3.6 Taking No Public Action3.7 Conclusion3.7.1 Table 13.7.2 Table 23.7.3 Table 3References
4. Academic Whistleblowing4.1 The Whistleblowing Dilemma4.2 To Whom Can One Blow the Academic Whistle?4.2.1 Whistleblowing Directly to the Suspected Plagiarist4.2.2 Whistleblowing in a Post-Publication Review Venue4.2.3 Whistleblowing to a Journal or Volume Editor4.2.4 Whistleblowing to a Publisher4.2.5 Whistleblowing to a University Research Integrity Office4.2.6 Whistleblowing to a Grant Agency4.2.7 Whistleblowing to a Journalist or News Agency4.2.8 Whistleblowing to the Genuine Authors4.3 Multi-Targeted Whistleblowing4.4 How will the Whistleblowing Impact the Academic Whistleblower?4.5 What Might Whistleblower Harassment and Academic Witness Intimidation Look Like?4.5.1 The National Grant Agency4.5.2 Journal Editors4.5.3 Research Integrity Offices4.6 Conclusion4.7 Appendix: Sample Letters for Requesting Corrections of the Scholarly Record4.7.1 Sample of Letter Requesting a Retraction4.7.2 Sample of Letter Requesting a Corrigendum4.7.3 Sample of Letter Requesting a Clarification of AuthorshipReferences
5. Publishing Corrections of the Scholarly Record: Some Test Cases
5.1 Disambiguating Retractions, Errata, and Corrigenda5.2 Case 1: Proceedings from the International Semiotics Institute5.3 Case 2: Subject Matters: A Journal of Communications and the Self5.4 Case 3: John Benjamins Publishing Company5.5 Case 4: The Catholic University of America Press5.6 Cases 5 and 6: Argumentation5.7 Case 7: Swiss Medical Weekly5.8 Cases 8 and 9: Brill Publishing5.9 Cases 10 and 11: Studies in Communication Sciences5.10 Case 12: Patient Education and Counseling5.11 Case 13: Science | Environment | Health5.12 Case 14: Journal of Communication in Healthcare5.13 Ten Corrections of the Scholarly Record5.14 Using the Correct Tools for Correction5.15 Responsibility for the Scholarly RecordReferences
6. Contested Authorship, Self-Plagiarism, and the Scholarly Record6.1 A Discredited Technique6.2 Disability Studies Quarterly6.2.1 The First Request for a Statement of Retraction6.2.2 The Second Request for a Statement of Retraction6.2.3 The Retraction6.3 Cambridge University Press6.3.1 The Request for Retraction6.4 An AnalogyReferences
Conclusion: Beyond the Published RetractionThe Database ProblemThe Anthology ProblemThe Platform ProblemThe Repository ProblemThe Pretend-It-Didn't-Happen ProblemA Partial AnswerInformal Corrections of the Scholarly RecordAdditional Disclosures of Corrections of the Scholarly RecordSolutionsThe Future of the Scholarly RecordReferences
Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より