Fostering integrity in research
著者
書誌事項
Fostering integrity in research
(Consensus study report)
The National Academies Press, c2017
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references: p. 287-309
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support – or distort – practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge.
The 1992 report Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated.
Responsible Science served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee's thought process. Fostering Integrity in Research identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices.
Table of Contents
Front Matter
Summary
Part One: The Integrity of Research
1 Introduction
2 Foundations of Integrity in Research: Core Values and Guiding Norms
3 Important Trends and Challenges in the Research Environment
Part Two: Research Misconduct and Detrimental Research Practices
4 Context and Definitions
5 Incidence and Consequences
6 Understanding the Causes
7 Addressing Research Misconduct and Detrimental Research Practices: Current Knowledge and Issues
8 Exploring New Approaches
Part Three: Fostering Integrity in Research
9 Identifying and Promoting Best Practices for Research Integrity
10 Education for the Responsible Conduct of Research
11 Findings and Recommendations
Appendixes
Appendix A: Biographical Information on the Committee and Staff
Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions
Appendix C: Assessing the Effectiveness of Responsible Conduct of Research Training: Key Findings and Viable Procedures
Appendix D: Detailed Case Histories
Appendix E: Bibliography
目次
- 1 Front Matter
- 2 Summary
- 3 1 Introduction
- 4 2 Foundations of Integrity in Research: Core Values and Guiding Norms
- 5 3 Important Trends and Challenges in the Research Environment
- 6 4 Context and Definitions
- 7 5 Incidence and Consequences
- 8 6 Understanding the Causes
- 9 7 Addressing Research Misconduct and Detrimental Research Practices: Current Knowledge and Issues
- 10 8 Exploring New Approaches
- 11 9 Identifying and Promoting Best Practices for Research Integrity
- 12 10 Education in the Responsible Conduct of Research
- 13 11 Findings and Recommendations
- 14 Appendix A Biographical Information of Committee and Staff
- 15 Appendix B Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions
- 16 Appendix C Assessing the Effectiveness of Responsible Conduct of Research Training: Key Findings and Viable Procedures
- 17 Appendix D Detailed Case Histories
- 18 Appendix E Bibliography
「Nielsen BookData」 より