Freedom and censorship in early modern English literature
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Freedom and censorship in early modern English literature
(Routledge studies in Renaissance literature and culture, 48)
Routledge, 2019
Available at 2 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p.[207]-230) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Broadening the notion of censorship, this volume explores the transformative role played by early modern censors in the fashioning of a distinct English literature in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. In early modern England, the Privy Council, the Bishop of London and the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Stationers' Company, and the Master of the Revels each dealt with their own prerogatives and implemented different forms of censorship, with the result that authors penning both plays and satires had to juggle with various authorities and unequal degrees of freedom from one sector to the other. Text and press control thus did not give way to systematic intervention but to particular responses adapted to specific texts in a specific time.
If the restrictions imposed by regulation practices are duly acknowledged in this edited collection, the different contributors are also keen to enhance the positive impact of censorship on early modern literature. The most difficult task consists in finding the exact moment when the balance tips in favour of creativity, and the zone where, in matters of artistic freedom, the disadvantages outweigh the benefits. This is what the twelve chapters of the volume proceed to do. Thanks to a wide variety of examples, they show that, in the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras, regulations seldom prevented writers to make themselves heard, albeit through indirect channels. By contrast, in the 1630s, the increased supremacy of the Church seemed to tip the balance the other way.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Table of illustrations
Textual Note
Notes on Contributors
General Introduction:'"To be seen and allowed": Early Modern Regulation Practices'
1. 'An Incident in the History of English Book Burning'
2. 'Satire, Immoderation and the Bishops' Ban of 1599'
3. '"I like not this": Censorship, Self-Censorship and Collaboration in Early Modern Dramatic Manuscripts'
4. 'The Limits of a Censor's Authority: The Case of the Masters of the Revels'
5. 'Revisiting an Old Controversy: Censorship in Doctor Faustus'
6. '"An you talk in blank verse": the Poetics of Liberty in As You Like It'
7. 'The Malcontent's Fool, Censorship, and the Construction of the Subject'
8. '"Let him speak no more": Trust, Censorship, and Early Modern Anti-Confession'
9. 'What Florio did not Translate: the Return of the Repressed in the English Rendering of Montaigne's Essays'
10. 'Spenser's Strategies of Indirect Representation in The Faerie Queene (1590)'
11. '(Self-)Censorship in Lady Mary Wroth's The Countess of Montgomery's Urania (1621-1630)'
12. '"No cloudy stuff to puzzle the brain": 'Fair Editing' and Censorship in John Benson's Edition of Shakespeare's Poems (1640)'
Coda:'Early Modern English Censorship in European Context'
General Bibliography
Index
by "Nielsen BookData"