Comparison in anthropology : the impossible method
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Comparison in anthropology : the impossible method
(New departures in anthropology)
Cambridge University Press, 2019
- : pbk.
- : hardback
Available at 8 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 365-383) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Why and how do social and cultural anthropologists make comparisons? What problems do they encounter in doing so, and how might these be resolved? What, if anything, makes one comparison better than another? This book answers these questions by exploring the many ways in which, from the nineteenth century to the present day, comparative methods have been conceptualised and re-invented, praised and rejected, multiplied and unified. Anthropologists today use comparisons to describe and to explain, to generalise and to challenge generalisations, to critique and to create new concepts. In this multiplicity of often contradictory aims lie both the key challenge of anthropological comparison, and also its key strength. Matei Candea maps a path through that entangled conversation, providing a ground-up re-assessment of the key conceptual issues at the heart of any form of anthropological comparison, whilst creating a bold charter for reconsidering the value of comparison in anthropology and beyond.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Part I. Impossibilities: 1. The impossible method
- 2. The garden of forking paths
- 3. Caesurism and heuristics
- Part II. An Archetype: 4. Comparatio
- 5. Two ends of lateral comparison: identity and alterity
- 6. Another dimension of lateral comparison: identity and intensity
- 7. Two ends of frontal comparison: identity, alterity, reflexivity
- 8. The oscillations of frontal comparison: identity, intensity, reflexivity
- 9. Rigour
- Conclusion.
by "Nielsen BookData"