The right to housing in law and society
著者
書誌事項
The right to housing in law and society
(Routledge research in human rights law)
Routledge, 2018
- : hbk
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
From the very first negotiations of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights half a century ago to the present day, socio-economic rights have often been regarded as less enforceable than civil and political rights. The right to adequate housing, even though protecting one of the most basic needs of human beings, has not escaped this classification. Despite its strong foundations in international, regional and domestic legislation, many people are still deprived of one or more of the different key elements that comprise adequate housing.
How, then, can international human rights theory and case law be developed into effective vehicles at the domestic level? Rather than focusing merely on possibilities for individualized relief through the court system, The Right to Housing in Law and Society looks into more effective socio-economic rights realization by addressing both conceptual and practical stumbling blocks that hinder a more structural progress at the national level. The Flemish and Belgian housing legislation and policy are used to highlight the problems and illustrate the pathways here presented.
While first and foremost legal in its approach, the book also offers a more sociological perspective on the functioning of the right to housing in practice. It shows the latest state of knowledge on the topic and will be of interest to researchers, academics, policymakers and students in the fields of international socio-economic rights law and human rights law more generally.
目次
Introduction
1. International Acknowledgment of the Importance of Housing
2. Approach and Aims of the Book
3. The Belgian and Flemish Right to Housing as Illustration
PART I
An Effective Right to Housing: Beyond Legal-Technical Issues
1 Human Dignity: A Guiding Principle for a Stronger Right to Housing?
1. Exploring the Content of Human Dignity and Its Use in a Human Rights Context
A. History of the Concept
B. Human Dignity in a Human Rights Context
1) First Function: A Foundation for Human Rights
2) Second Function: A Value/Right to Protect and Guarantee
C. The Added Value and Pitfalls of Using Human Dignity
1) As an Equivalent of Decent or Adequate Housing
2) As an Open-Ended Norm for Courts and Other Institutions
a. A Driving Force for Other Rights
b. The Other Side of the Coin: A Race to the Bottom?
c. Subjective vs. Objective Dignity
4. Impact on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Right to Housing
A. Obligations of Result or Conduct? According to Private or International Law?
B. A Recipe for Confusion
5. Towards Result-Oriented Obligations?
A. The Right to Housing as an Obligation of Result
B. A Result-Oriented Approach
6. Conclusion
5 Progressive Realization and Retrogressive Measures
1. Introduction
2. The Concept of Progressive Realization under Scrutiny: From a Housing Rights Perspective
A. Progressiveness as a Flexibility Device
B. Flexibility Does Not Equal Freedom of Obligations
1) Drittwirkung
2) Immediate Obligations
3) Minimum Core
C. Focus on Progressiveness
3. Retrogressive Measures and Financial Constraints
A. Origins in International Human Rights Law
B. Justification of Retrogressive Measures in International Human Rights Law
1) Presumption of Impermissibility
2) More Leeway for Budgetary Concerns?
3) Connection between Article 2(1) and 4 ICESCR
4) Budgetary Concerns: The Position of the European Committee of Social Rights
C. The Application in Belgian Case Law
1) A Broader Margin of Appreciation: No Presumption of Non-Retrogression
2) Practical Problems: Establishing Retrogression
3) A Different Application of the Principle: The Proportionality Test
D. Appropriateness of Retrogressive Measures
4. Conclusion
6 Towards Result-Oriented Obligations
1. International Monitoring Techniques
2. Enforceability of Progressive Realization
A. A Review Criterion
B. Reasonableness
1) Different Scopes of Reasonableness
2) Reasonableness as Appropriateness
a. A Preliminary Proposal
b. Possible Criticism and Imperfections
3. Combining Monitoring and Reasonableness
A. Overview of the Proposal
B. Requirements and Areas of Concern
1) The Monitoring Body
2) Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Analysis: Practical Difficulties
3) Enforceability of Progress
5. Conclusion
Conclusions
Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より