Comparative reasoning in international courts and tribunals
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Comparative reasoning in international courts and tribunals
（Cambridge studies in international and comparative law, 145）
Cambridge University Press, 2019
Available at / 11 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 222-248) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Domestic law has long been recognised as a source of international law, an inspiration for legal developments, or the benchmark against which a legal system is to be assessed. Academic commentary normally re-traces these well-trodden paths, leaving one with the impression that the interaction between domestic and international law is unworthy of further enquiry. However, a different - and surprisingly pervasive - nexus between the two spheres has been largely overlooked: the use of domestic law in the interpretation of international law. This book examines the practice of five international courts and tribunals to demonstrate that domestic law is invoked to interpret international law, often outside the framework of Articles 31 to 33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. It assesses the appropriateness of such recourse to domestic law as well as situating the practice within broader debates regarding interpretation and the interaction between domestic and international legal systems.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- 1. The limits of the Vienna Convention
- 2. Domestic law in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice
- 3. The interpretation of schedules of commitments in the WTO
- 4. International investment law and the public law analogy
- 5. Consensus doctrine in the European Court of Human Rights
- 6. Domestic law and system building in the ICTY
- Conclusion.
by "Nielsen BookData"
