Ens primum cognitum in Thomas Aquinas and the tradition : the philosophy of being as first known
著者
書誌事項
Ens primum cognitum in Thomas Aquinas and the tradition : the philosophy of being as first known
(Value inquiry book series, v. 309 . Gilson studies)
Brill Rodopi, c2017
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [353]-372) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Ens Primum Cognitum in Thomas Aquinas and the Tradition presents a reading of Thomas Aquinas' claim that "being" is the first object of the human intellect. Blending the insights of both the early Thomistic tradition (c.1380-1637AD) and the Leonine Thomistic revival (1879-present), Brian Kemple examines how this claim of Aquinas has been traditionally understood, and what is lacking in that understanding.
While the recent tradition has emphasized the primacy of the real (so-called ens reale) in human recognition of the primum cognitum, Kemple argues that this misinterprets Aquinas, thereby closing off Thomistic philosophy to the broader perspective needed to face the philosophical challenges of today, and proposes an alternative interpretation with dramatic epistemological and metaphysical consequences.
目次
Acknowledgements
Introduction: Escaping the Framework of Modernity
Prefatory Notes on Terminology
Subject and Object, ens naturae and ens rationis
Ideoscopic and Cenoscopic
Concept, verbum mentis, species expressa
Ens ut primum cognitum and ens primum cognitum
Influential Approaches to Ens Primum Cognitum
Objectively and Socially-Constituted Reality
Thomas Aquinas: Intellectus Agens, Verbum Mentis, Relatio
1 The Latin Thomists and Ens Primum Cognitum
1.1 The Early Dispute: Setting the Stage
1.1.1 The Scotistic Foil
1.2 Thomas Cajetan and the Doctrine of Being
1.2.1 Cajetan's Four Cognitions and Three Abstractions
1.2.2 The Doctrine of Analogy
1.2.3 Conclusion
1.3 John Poinsot, the Nature of Concepts and Ens ut Primum Cognitum
1.3.1 Objectivity and Conceptualization
1.3.2 De Primo Cognito
1.3.3 Objectivity and the Concept of Ens Primum Cognitum
2 Recent Thomistic Interpretations of Ens Primum Cognitum
2.1 Etienne Gilson's "Metaphysical Realism"
2.1.1 Overcoming Critique
2.1.2 Abstraction and the Nature of the Concept
2.1.3 Realism vs. Idealism and the Question of Ens ut Primum Cognitum
2.2 Jacques Maritain
2.2.1 Maritain on Abstraction
2.2.2 Concept Formation
2.2.3 Maritain on Ens Primum Cognitum
2.3 Conclusion
3 The Intellectus Agens and Concept Formation
3.1 St. Thomas and the Obiectum Intellectus
3.1.1 Ens, ens ut verum, and ens intelligibile
3.1.2 Quod quid est, quid est, and quod quid erat esse
3.1.3 Quidditas rei and quidditas rei materialis
3.2 Intellectus Agens
3.2.1 Illuminare
3.2.2 Digression on Nature: Matter, Form, and Understanding
3.2.3 Abstrahere
4 The Discursion of Concept Formation
4.1 The Discursion of Intellectual Discovery
4.1.1 From Pre-Philosophical Cognition to Philosophical Science
4.1.2 Intellectual Discovery and the Philosophical Sciences
4.2 Formation of the Verbum Mentis
4.2.1 The Derivation of Primary Concepts
4.2.2 Terminus of Intellectual Operation and Intentional Fundamentum
4.2.3 Necessity of Composition
4.2.4 Definition and Quiddity
4.3 A Recursive Analysis of the Species Expressa
4.3.1 True and False Concepts
4.3.2 Species Expressae and Cognition-Dependent Objects
4.3.3 What is Inessential to Things is Essential to Our Concepts
5 Relation and Ens Primum Cognitum
5.1 What is Relation?
5.1.1 Relativa Secundum Esse
5.1.2 Relativa Secundum Dici
5.1.3 The Constitution of Cognition-Dependent Relative Being
5.2 Relations and Objectivity
5.2.1 Intellectual Apprehension of Relations
5.2.2 Interpretation and the Constitution of Objective Realities
5.2.3 "Reality", "The Real", and Objective Constitution
6 The Nature of Ens Primum Cognitum
6.1 Summary of Argument
6.2 The Nature of Ens Primum Cognitum
6.2.1 St. Thomas and the Resolutio ad Ens Primum Cognitum
6.3 Conclusion
References Historically Layered
「Nielsen BookData」 より