The Korean diaspora in postwar Japan : geopolitics, identity and nation-building
著者
書誌事項
The Korean diaspora in postwar Japan : geopolitics, identity and nation-building
（International library of twentieth century history, 94）
I.B. Tauris, 2020, c2017
- : pb
電子リソースにアクセスする 全1件
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全4件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 254-270) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The indistinct status of the Zainichi has meant that, since the late 1940s, two ethnic Korean associations, the Chongryun (pro-North) and the Mindan (pro-South) have been vying for political loyalty from the Zainichi, with both groups initially opposing their assimilation in Japan. Unlike the Korean diasporas living in Russia, China or the US, the Zainichi have become sharply divided along political lines as a result. Myung Ja Kim examines Japan's changing national policies towards the Zainichi in order to understand why this group has not been fully integrated into Japan. Through the prism of this ethnically Korean community, the book reveals the dynamics of alliances and alignments in East Asia, including the rise of China as an economic superpower, the security threat posed by North Korea and the diminishing alliance between Japan and the US. Taking a post-war historical perspective, the research reveals why the Zainichi are vital to Japan's state policy revisionist aims to increase its power internationally and how they were used to increase the country's geopolitical leverage.With a focus on International Relations, this book provides an important analysis of the mechanisms that lie behind nation-building policy, showing the conditions controlling a host state's treatment of diasporic groups.
目次
Introduction
Alliance Cohesion, Diaspora and Nation-Building Policies
Zainichi Diaspora: from the Shadow of Japan's Colonial Legacy
No Alliance and a Strong Historical Legacy-Exclusionary
Policies towards the Zainichi in the Post-World War II Era (1945-1964)
Alliance Cohesion Matters: Japan's Policy towards the Zainichi during the Cold War Era (1965-1980s)
Does Alliance Cohesion Still Matter in the New Post-Cold War Geopolitical Era (1990-2014)?
Conclusion
「Nielsen BookData」 より
