Laws and explanations; theories and modal possibilities
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Laws and explanations; theories and modal possibilities
(Synthese library, v. 410)
Springer, c2019
Available at 7 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
The book has two parts: In the first, after a review of some seminal classical accounts of laws and explanations, a new account is proposed for distinguishing between laws and accidental generalizations (LAG). Among the new consequences of this proposal it is proved that any explanation of a contingent generalization shows that the generalization is not accidental. The second part involves physical theories, their modality, and their explanatory power. In particular, it is shown that (1) Each theory has a theoretical implication structure associated with it, such that there are new physical modal operators on these structures and also special modal entities that are in these structures. A special subset of the physical modals, the nomic modals are associated with the laws of theories. (2) The familiar idea that theories always explain laws by deduction of them has to be seriously modified in light of the fact that there are a host of physical theories (including for example, Newtonian Classical mechanics, Hamiltonian, and Lagrangian theory, and probability theory) that we believe are schematic (they do not have any truth value). Nevertheless, we think that there is a kind of non-deductive explanation and generality that they achieve by subsumtion under a schema.
Table of Contents
- Part I: Appreciating and Burnishing the PastChapter 1. IntroductionChapter 2. C.Hempel: In the beginning ....Chapter 3. Laws and their corresponding counterfactuals
- an untenable connectionChapter 4. F.Dretske's Total rejection of the Hempel model. Universals and Magnitudes to the rescueChapter 5. Prelude to D.Armstrong: A mathematical movement which inspired Ramsey, and left Russell and Armstrong unmovedChapter 6. D.Armstrong's account of laws. Identity lost, regained, and lost again Part II: The Relatvization of Laws to Theoretical scenarios, Schematic Theories and Physical and Nomic modalsChapter 7. Laws and Accidental Generalizations. A new, minimal theory of the differenceChapter 8. E.Nagel and R.B.Braithwaite. Two neglected radical and radically different theories: one inspired by Hilbert, the other by RamseyChapter 9. D.Hilbert's Architectural structuralism, and Schematic TheoriesChapter 10. Theories, their magnitude spaces, and the physical possibilities they provideChapter 11. Theories, laws, and nomic possibilities (modals)Chapter 12. Schematic theories, subsumtion of laws, and non-accidental generalizations
by "Nielsen BookData"