{"@context":{"owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","bibo":"http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","prism":"http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/","cinii":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ns/1.0/","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/"},"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BC00757562.json","@graph":[{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BC00757562#entity","@type":"bibo:Book","foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf":{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BC00757562.json"},"dc:title":[{"@value":"The critique of religion and religion's critique : on dialectical religiology"}],"dc:creator":"edited by Dustin J. Byrd","dc:publisher":[{"@value":"Brill"}],"dcterms:extent":"xix, 334 p.","cinii:size":"24 cm","dc:language":"eng","dc:date":"2020","cinii:ncid":"BC00757562","cinii:ownerCount":"2","foaf:maker":[{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/author/DA19182821#entity","@type":"foaf:Person","foaf:name":[{"@value":"Byrd, Dustin"}]}],"bibo:owner":[{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/library/FA001007","@type":"foaf:Organization","foaf:name":"北海道大学 附属図書館","rdfs:seeAlso":{"@id":"https://opac.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/opac/opac_openurl/?ncid=BC00757562"}},{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/library/FA007965","@type":"foaf:Organization","foaf:name":"関西大学 図書館","rdfs:seeAlso":{"@id":"https://www.lib.kansai-u.ac.jp/webopac/ufirdi.do?ufi_target=ctlsrh&ncid=BC00757562"}}],"bibo:lccn":["2020008691"],"rdfs:seeAlso":[{"@id":"https://lccn.loc.gov/2020008691"}],"prism:publicationDate":["c2020"],"cinii:note":["Includes bibliographical references and index","Summary: \"In The Critique of Religion and Religion's Critique: On Dialectical Religiology, Dustin J. Byrd compiles numerous essays honouring the life and work of the Critical Theorist, Rudolf J. Siebert. His \"dialectical religiology,\" rooted in the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, especially Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse, Erich Fromm, Leo Löwenthal, and Jürgen Habermas, is both a theory and method of understanding religion's critique of modernity and modernity's critique of religion. Born out of the Enlightenment and its most important thinkers, i.e. Kant, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud, religion is understood to be dialectical in nature. It contains within it both revolutionary and emancipatory elements, but also reactionary and regressive elements, which perpetuate mankind's continual debasement, enslavement, and oppression. Thus, religion by nature is conflicted within itself and thus stands against itself. ...\""],"dc:subject":["LCC:BL51","DC23:210"],"foaf:topic":[{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/books/search?q=Religion+--+Philosophy","dc:title":"Religion -- Philosophy"},{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/books/search?q=Frankfurt+school+of+sociology","dc:title":"Frankfurt school of sociology"},{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/books/search?q=Critical+theory","dc:title":"Critical theory"}],"dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@id":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA70442845#entity","dc:title":"Studies in critical social sciences, v. 165","@type":"bibo:Book"}],"dcterms:hasPart":[{"@id":"urn:isbn:9789004419032","dc:title":": hardback"}]}]}