Reputation for resolve : how leaders signal determination in international politics
著者
書誌事項
Reputation for resolve : how leaders signal determination in international politics
（Cornell studies in security affairs / edited by Robert J. Art, Robert Jervis, and Stephen M. Walt）
Cornell University Press, 2020
- : cloth
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全5件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 231-243) and index
収録内容
- Introduction : why leaders and their reputations for resolve matter
- How leaders establish reputations for resolve
- How leader-specific reputations form and change across repeated interactions
- How contextual factors influence leader-specific reputations
- A reputation for resolute action : Eisenhower and Berlin
- A reputation for irresolute action : Kennedy, Berlin, and Cuba
- Conclusions : lessons in leader-specific reputations for resolve
内容説明・目次
内容説明
How do reputations form in international politics? What influence do these reputations have on the conduct of international affairs? In Reputation for Resolve, Danielle L. Lupton takes a new approach to answering these enduring and hotly debated questions by shifting the focus away from the reputations of countries and instead examining the reputations of individual leaders.
Lupton argues that new leaders establish personal reputations for resolve that are separate from the reputations of their predecessors and from the reputations of their states. Using innovative survey experiments and in-depth archival research, she finds that leaders acquire personal reputations for resolve based on their foreign policy statements and behavior. Reputation for Resolve shows that statements create expectations of how leaders will react to foreign policy crises in the future and that leaders who fail to meet expectations of resolute action face harsh reputational consequences.
Reputation for Resolve challenges the view that reputations do not matter in international politics. In sharp contrast, Lupton shows that the reputations for resolve of individual leaders influence the strategies statesmen pursue during diplomatic interactions and crises, and she delineates specific steps policymakers can take to avoid developing reputations for irresolute action. Lupton demonstrates that reputations for resolve do exist and can influence the conduct of international security. Thus, Reputation for Resolve reframes our understanding of the influence of leaders and their rhetoric on crisis bargaining and the role reputations play in international politics.
目次
Introduction: Why Leaders and Their Reputations for Resolve Matter
1. How Leaders Establish Reputations for Resolve
2. How Leader-Specific Reputations Form and Change across Repeated Interactions
3. How Contextual Factors Influence Leader-Specific Reputations
4. A Reputation for Resolute Action: Eisenhower and Berlin
5. A Reputation for Irresolute Action: Kennedy, Berlin, and Cuba
Conclusion: Lessons in Leader-Specific Reputations for Resolve
「Nielsen BookData」 より
