The integration of the humanities and arts with sciences, engineering, and medicine in higher education : branches from the same tree
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
The integration of the humanities and arts with sciences, engineering, and medicine in higher education : branches from the same tree
(Consensus study report)
The National Academies Press, c2018
Available at 2 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
"Committee on Integrating Higher Education in the Arts, Humanities, Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs"
"A consensus study report of The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine"
Description and Table of Contents
Description
In the United States, broad study in an array of different disciplines ?arts, humanities, science, mathematics, engineering? as well as an in-depth study within a special area of interest, have been defining characteristics of a higher education. But over time, in-depth study in a major discipline has come to dominate the curricula at many institutions. This evolution of the curriculum has been driven, in part, by increasing specialization in the academic disciplines. There is little doubt that disciplinary specialization has helped produce many of the achievement of the past century. Researchers in all academic disciplines have been able to delve more deeply into their areas of expertise, grappling with ever more specialized and fundamental problems.
Yet today, many leaders, scholars, parents, and students are asking whether higher education has moved too far from its integrative tradition towards an approach heavily rooted in disciplinary "silos". These "silos" represent what many see as an artificial separation of academic disciplines. This study reflects a growing concern that the approach to higher education that favors disciplinary specialization is poorly calibrated to the challenges and opportunities of our time.
The Integration of the Humanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education examines the evidence behind the assertion that educational programs that mutually integrate learning experiences in the humanities and arts with science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) lead to improved educational and career outcomes for undergraduate and graduate students. It explores evidence regarding the value of integrating more STEMM curricula and labs into the academic programs of students majoring in the humanities and arts and evidence regarding the value of integrating curricula and experiences in the arts and humanities into college and university STEMM education programs.
Table of Contents
Front Matter
Summary
1 Challenges and Opportunities for Integrating Established
Disciplines in Higher Education
2 Higher Education and the Demands of the Twenty-First Century
3 What Is Integration?
4 The Challenges of Assessing the Impact of Integration in Higher
Education on Students
5 Understanding and Overcoming the Barriers to Integration in
Higher Education
6 The Effects of Integration on Students at the Undergraduate Level
7 Integration in Graduate and Medical Education
8 Findings and Recommendations
Epilogue
References
Appendix I: Committee and Staff Biographies
Appendix II: Statement of Task
Appendix III: Meeting Agendas
Gallery of Illuminating and Inspirational Integrative Practices in
Higher Education
by "Nielsen BookData"