Discussions in dispute resolution : the foundational articles

著者

書誌事項

Discussions in dispute resolution : the foundational articles

edited by Art Hinshaw, Andrea Kupfer Schneider, and Sarah Rudolph Cole

Oxford University Press, c2021

  • : hardback

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全4件

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Includes bibliographical references

内容説明・目次

内容説明

While arbitration was robust in colonial and early America, dispute resolution lost its footing to the court system as the United States grew into a bustling and burgeoning country. And while dispute resolution processes emerged briefly from time to time, they were dormant until the enactment of the Federal Arbitration Act and collective bargaining grew out of the labor movement. But it wasn't until 1976, when Frank Sander delivered his famous remarks at the Pound Conference, that the modern dispute resolution movement was born. By the year 2000, alternative dispute resolution had transformed from a populist rebellion against the judicial system to mainstream legal practice. Today, lawyers and retiring judges look to arbitration and mediation for a career pivot, and law schools train law students in the finer arts of dispute resolution practice as both providers and advocates. Discussions in Dispute Resolution brings together the modern dispute resolution field's most influential commentaries in its first few decades and reflects on what makes these pieces so important. This book collects 16 foundational writings, four pieces from each of the field's primary subfields-negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and public policy. Each piece has four commenters who answer the question: why is this work a foundational piece in the dispute resolution field? The purpose in asking this simple question is fourfold: to hail the field's foundational generation and their work, to bring a fresh look at these articles, to engage the articles' original authors where possible, and to challenge the articles with the benefit of hindsight. Where possible, the book gives the authors of the original pieces the opportunity either to reflect on the piece itself or to respond to the other commenters.

目次

Introduction Table of Contributors Acknowledgments Part 1. Negotiation Article 1.1. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce (1979)--Robert H. Mnookin and Lewis Kornhauser Comments: Elizabeth C. Tippett--Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case for ADR as a Field of Study Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff--Taking Human Behavior Seriously Rishi Batra--Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Classic Article with a Contemporary Challenge Robert H. Mnookin--Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law Re-assessed Article 1.2. Machiavelli and the Bar: Ethical Limitations on Lying in Negotiation (1980)--James J. White Comments: Michael Moffitt--Machiavelli and the Bar and Ethical Ratcheting Peter R. Reilly--Machiavelli and the Bar: J.J. White as Negotiation Ethics Architect Lauren A. Newell--Machiavelli and the Bar: Prescient in Part James J. White--Confronting Lying in Negotiation Article 1.3. Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving (1984)--Carrie Menkel-Meadow Comments: Russell Korobkin--We Are All Problem Solvers Now Erin R. Archerd--It's Not the Lawyers We Need to Convince: Commentary on Legal Negotiation by Carrie Menkel-Meadow Andrea Kupfer Schneider--Counseling About More than the Law Carrie Menkel-Meadow--The Origins of Problem Solving Negotiation and Its Use in the Present Article 1.4. The Limits of Integrative Bargaining (1996)--Gerald B. Wetlaufer Comments: Jennifer Reynolds--Oversimplifying, Overselling, Overreaching Noam Ebner--Integrative Negotiation: Paying the Price of Popularity Robert C. Bordone--Strengthening Integrative Bargaining: How The Limits of Integrative Bargaining Sharpened the Work of Negotiation Scholars Gerald B. Wetlaufer--Reflections on The Limits of Integrative Bargaining Part 2. Mediation Article 2.1. Mediation: Its Forms and Functions (1971)--Lon L. Fuller Comments: Art Hinshaw--Lon L. Fuller: Private Ordering and Mediation Nancy A. Welsh--The Untethering of Mediation from Relationships James J. Alfini--Lon Fuller's Influence on the Debate Over Mediator Orientations Becky L. Jacobs--Lon Fuller: A Progenitor of the Pedagogy of Skills? Article 2.2. The Theory and Practice of Mediation: A Reply to Professor Susskind (1981)--Joseph B. Stulberg Comments: Lela Porter Love--A Star to Steer Her By Brian A. Pappas--Just Settlement? Rethinking the Mediator's Goals Bobbi McAdoo and Sharon Press--Neutrality in 2020: A Reply to 1981 Stulberg Joseph B. Stulberg--Revisiting Mediator Neutrality Article 2.3. The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women (1991)--Trina Grillo Comments: Carol Pauli--Trina Grillo: Productive Rage Karen Tokarz--Grillo's Rigorous Path to Intentional, Mindful Mediation Douglas N. Frenkel--The Grillo Effect at Thirty Kelly Browe Olson--Post-Grillo: New Family Mediation Protections and Revised Dangers Article 2.4. Understanding Mediators' Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed (1996)--Leonard L. Riskin Comments: Michael T. Colatrella, Jr.--"True Enough" Alyson Carrel--Dismantling the "Facilitative" "Evaluative" Dichotomy: Reflecting on Riskin's Grid and Predicting the Future Donna Erez-Navot--The Riskin Grid: A Mixed Legacy Kimberlee Kovach--Growth from the Grid? Part 3. Arbitration Article 3.1. The New Federal Arbitration Law (1926)--Julius Henry Cohen and Kenneth Dayton Comments: Carli N. Conklin--A Robust History of Arbitration in Early America: Commentary on The New Federal Arbitration Law Imre S. Szalai--The Federal Arbitration Act in Its Infancy: Cohen and Dayton's The New Federal Arbitration Law Kristen Blankley--The New Federal Arbitration Law: A Call to Ethical Practice Not Yet Realized Amy J. Schmitz--Emphasizing Efficiency in the Digital Age Article 3.2. Commercial Arbitration (1961)--Soia Mentschikoff Comments: Sarah R. Cole--Everything Old Is New Again W. Mark C. Weidemaier--The Legacy of Soia Mentschikoff's Commercial Arbitration David Horton--Inside the Black Box: A Short Comment on Soia Mentschikoff's Commercial Arbitration Stephen J. Ware--Lasting Lessons from Mentschikoff's Commercial Arbitration Article 3.3. Panacea or Corporate Tool?: Debunking the Supreme Court's Preference for Binding Arbitration (1996)--Jean R. Sternlight Comments: Jill I. Gross--Rethinking the Debunking: On Arbitration Myths, Preferences, and Legal Theory Hiro N. Aragaki--The Critical Theory Legacy of Jean Sternlight's Panacea or Corporate Tool? Michael Z. Green--Framing the Debate to Show How Big Guys Insist That Little Guys Arbitrate as a Corporate Tool Jean R. Sternlight--Panacea or Corporate Tool?: The Sequel Article 3.4. Employment Arbitration: The Repeat Player Effect (1997)--Lisa B. Bingham [Lisa Blomgren Amsler] Comments: Alexander J.S. Colvin--The River's Source: Empirical Research and Lisa Blomgren Amsler's Employment Arbitration: The Repeat Player Effect Martin H. Malin--Arbitration's Catalyst for Empirical Studies Richard Bales--The Historical Context of Lisa Blomgren Amsler's Empirical Work on Employment Arbitration Lisa Blomgren Amsler--Why the Haves Come Out Farther and Farther Ahead: The Repeat Player Effect, Control Over Dispute System Design, and Justice Part 4. Dispute Resolution Public Policy Article 4.1. Why the "Haves" Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)--Marc Galanter Comments: John Lande--For Pragmatic Romanticism in Law and Dispute Resolution: Reflections on Galanter's Remarkably Realistic Analysis of Why the Have-Nots Come Out Behind Dwight Golann--A Prescient Warning of the Vulnerabilities in ADR Cynthia Alkon--Galanter's Analysis of the "Limits of Legal Change" as Applied to Criminal Cases and Reform Marc Galanter--Reflections on Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead Article 4.2. Varieties of Dispute Processing (1976)--Frank E. A. Sander Comments: Donna Shestowsky--How Useful Is Court ADR If Litigants (Still) Don't Know About It? Lydia Nussbaum--Dispute Processing Beyond the Courts-New Complexity, Old Problems Deborah Thompson Eisenberg--Frank Sander: Father of Court-Based Dispute Resolution Yael Efron--Varieties of Dispute Processing: The Implications on Legal Education Article 4.3. Against Settlement (1984)--Owen M. Fiss Comments: Amy J. Cohen--ADR and Public Values Again Ellen Waldman--What Against Settlement Got Right Adam S. Zimmerman--From Mass Adjudication to Settlement and Back Marjorie Corman Aaron--The Haunting Specter of Fiss's Against Settlement Article 4.4. Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-Opted or "The Law of ADR" (1991)--Carrie Menkel-Meadow Comments: Ellen E. Deason--Dimensions of Quality of Justice Elayne E. Greenberg--ADR's Place at the Justice Table James Coben--Foundational Because Prescient (and Unfortunately, Cassandra-like Prescience) Carrie Menkel-Meadow--Institutionalizing ADR: Clashing Values

「Nielsen BookData」 より

詳細情報

ページトップへ