The invention of duty : stoicism as deontology
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
The invention of duty : stoicism as deontology
(Philosophia antiqua, v. 157)
Brill, c2021
- : hardback
Available at 4 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [159]-164) and indexes
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Did the ancient Greeks and Romans have a concept of moral duty? Jack Visnjic seeks to settle this long-standing controversy in The Invention of Duty: Stoicism as Deontology. According to the prevailing view, ancient ethical systems lacked any sense of moral obligation and were built instead around notions of virtue and human flourishing. Visnjic argues that, millennia before Kant, the Stoics already developed a robust notion of moral duty as well as a sophisticated deontological ethics. While most writings of the Stoics perished, their concept of duty lived on and eventually came to influence the modern notion. In fact, there are strong indications that Kant's formulation of a new duty-based morality was inspired by his encounter with Stoic ideas.
"I found Visnjic's account of Stoic ethics rich and stimulating [...]. I am now converted to the view that one ought to think of Stoic kathekonta as duties rather than merely appropriate courses of action and I am grateful to Visnjic for pushing this point."
-John Sellars, Royal Holloway, University of London, Bryn Mawr Classical Review (July 2021)
Table of Contents
Preface
Diagrams
Abbreviations
Note to the Reader
Introduction
1 The Birth of a Concept
1 How to Say "Duty" in Ancient Greek
2 The Original Meaning of Kathekon
3 Activities Prescribed by Nature
4 Zeno's "Etymology" of Kathekon
5 Final Remarks about Translating Kathekon
2 Rules Are for Fools
1 The Nature of the Evidence
2 Are Kathekonta Rules?
3 The Disturbing Theses
4 Duties in Dire Circumstances
5 How Duties Change
6 Variations of the No-Rules Interpretation
7 Reconstructing the Typology of Kathekonta
8 Conclusion
3 A Formula for Action
1 In Search of a Stoic Method of Deliberation
2 Cicero's Formula
3 Seneca's Formula
4 What about Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius?
5 Conclusion
4 Discovering Duty
1 The Deliberator's Toolkit: Kanones and Regulae
2 Where Does the Formula Come In?
3 Taking Guidance from Roles
4 How Roles, Regulae, and the Formula Work Together
5 Conclusion
5 Kant and the Stoics
1 On the Various Approaches to Studying Kant's Stoic Influences
2 How Much Ancient Philosophy Did Kant Know?
3 Kant and the Stoics on the Will and Practical Reason
4 Kant and the Stoics on Happiness
5 Conclusion
6 Kant and Kathekon
1 Two Types of Dutiful Actions
2 Maxims vs. Dogmata
3 The Categorical Imperative
4 The Formula of Humanity
5 Conclusion
Afterword
Appendix 1: Determining the Meaning of Kathekon
Appendix 2: New Translations of Key Passages
Bibliography
Index
by "Nielsen BookData"