The intricacies of dicta and dissent
著者
書誌事項
The intricacies of dicta and dissent
Cambridge University Press, 2021
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
Summary: "Introduction We digress when, in intending to make a point, we either temporarily or permanently deviate from it. Digressions can be deliberate or unconscious. They can be to good or bad - or a mixture of good and bad - or to no effect. Distinguishing the digressive from the non-digressive is not always straightforward: comments offered as asides can strike at the very heart of a matter, just as narrative which a reader thinks peripheral might be the author's fil conducteur. Common-law judges often digress in the course of making legal decisions. The standard characterization of these digressions is that they are observations which are not integral to a decision that has been reached - that they could be taken out of a judgment without that judgment being undermined. The full legal Latin term for these observations is obiter dicta"-- Provided by publisher
内容説明・目次
内容説明
目次
- Preface
- Table of cases
- Prologue
- Essay I. Dicta: introduction
- 1. The civilian dimension
- 2. Case law as common law
- 3. 'Obiter' as legal entity
- 4. Dicta depicted
- 5. Oblique strategies
- 6. Engines of confusion
- 7. The necessity test
- 8. Cheap talk
- 9. Dicta and dicta
- 10. Nearly law?
- 11. Observation and authority
- 12. The sources problem
- Essay II. Dissent: introduction
- 13. Some preliminary observations on dissent
- 14. The nature of judicial dissent
- 15. Without contraries is no progression?
- 16. Stalemates and motivations
- 17. Dissents, decisions, and courts
- 18. The tug of unanimity in England's courts
- 19. Dissent in an apex court
- 20. When is a dissent not a dissent?
- 21. Minorities as authorities
- 22. Are we agreed?
- Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より