Monstrosity, disability, and the posthuman in the medieval and early modern world
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Monstrosity, disability, and the posthuman in the medieval and early modern world
(The new Middle Ages)
[Amazon], c2019
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 315-344) and index
Reprint. Originally published: Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, c2019
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This collection examines the intersection of the discourses of "disability" and "monstrosity" in a timely and necessary intervention in the scholarly fields of Disability Studies and Monster Studies. Analyzing Medieval and Early Modern art and literature replete with images of non-normative bodies, these essays consider the pernicious history of defining people with distinctly non-normative bodies or non-normative cognition as monsters. In many cases throughout Western history, a figure marked by what Rosemarie Garland-Thomson has termed "the extraordinary body" is labeled a "monster." This volume explores the origins of this conflation, examines the problems and possibilities inherent in it, and casts both disability and monstrosity in light of emergent, empowering discourses of posthumanism.
Table of Contents
Preface: De/Coupling Monstrosity and DisabilityTory V. Pearman, Miami UniversityIntroduction1. Embodied Difference: Monstrosity and Disability, and the PosthumanAsa Simon Mittman + Richard H. Godden, California State University, Chico, & Tulane University
Discourses of Bodily Difference2. From Monstrosity to Abnormality: Montaigne, Canguilhem, FoucaultKathleen Perry Long, Cornell University 3. "If in Other Respects He Appears to be Effectively Human": Defining Monstrosity in Medieval English LawEliza Buhrer, Colorado School of Mines4. (Dis)functional Faces: Signs of the Monstrous?Emily Cock + Patricia Skinner, University of Winchester5. Grendel and Goliath: Monstrous Superability and Disability in the Old English CorpusKaren Bruce Wallace, The Ohio State University6. E(race)ing the Future: Imagined Medieval Reproductive Possibilities and the Monstrosity of PowerShyama Rajendran, The George Washington University
Dis/Identifying the Other7. 'Blob Child' Revisited: Conflations of Monstrosity, Disability, and Race in King of TarsMolly Lewis, The George Washington University8. Attending to "Beasts Irrational" in Gower's Visio AnglieHaylie Swenson, George Washington University9. How a Monster Means: The Significance of Bodily Difference in the Christopher Cynocephalus TraditionSpencer Weinreich, University of Oxford10. Lycanthropy and Lunacy: Cognitive Disability in The Duchess of MalfiSonya Freeman Loftis, Morehouse College11. Eschatology for Cannibals: A System of Aberrance in the Old English AndreasLeah Pope Parker, University of Wisconsin-Madison12. The Monstrous Womb of Early Modern Midwifery ManualsMelissa Hull Geil, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Queer Couplings 13. Blindness and Posthuman Sexuality in Paradise LostJohn S. Garrison, Carroll University14. Dwelling Underground in The Book of John Mandeville: Monstrosity, Disability, EcologyAlan S. Montroso, English, George Washington University
Coda 15. Muteness and Disembodied Difference: Three Case StudiesKarl Steel, Brooklyn College and the Graduate Center, CUNY
by "Nielsen BookData"