Ethics in science : ethical misconduct in scientific research
著者
書誌事項
Ethics in science : ethical misconduct in scientific research
Produced by Amazon, c2019
2nd ed
- pbk
並立書誌 全1件
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Reprint. Originally published: Boca Raton : CRC Press, an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group , c2019
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Providing the tools necessary for a robust debate, this fully revised and updated second edition of Ethics in Science: Ethical Misconduct in Scientific Research explains various forms of scientific misconduct. The first part describes a variety of ethical violations, why they occur, how they are handled, and what can be done to prevent them along with a discussion of the peer-review process. The second presents real-life case studies that review the known facts, allowing readers to decide for themselves whether an ethical violation has occurred and if so, what should be done. With 4 new chapters and an updated selection of case studies, this text provides resources for guided discussion of topical controversies and how to prevent scientific misconduct.
Key Features:
Fully revised and updated text which explains the various forms of scientific misconduct.
New chapters include hot topics such as Ethics of the Pharmaceutical Industry, The Responsibility of Science to the Environment and Summary of Ethics Guidelines of STEM Professional Societies.
Provides the necessary tools to lead students in the discussion of topical controversies.
Includes descriptions of real ethical case studies, a number of which are new for the Second Edition.
This book is applicable to any science and any level of education.
目次
Scientific misconduct in research: What is it, why does it happen, and how do we identify when it happens?
What constitutes scientific misconduct?
Authorship and intellectual property.
Bad ethics vs. bad science.
New results that prove old results wrong.
The whistle-blower's dilemma.
What are the penalties for scientific misconduct?
Human and animal subjects.
What is peer review's role in scientific misconduct?
Revisiting Vlad and Frankie.
Can peer reviewers be unethical?
What effect on the public does scientific misconduct have?
MMR and autism.
Climategate.
HIV vaccine.
Animal rights groups.
Cold fusion.
Bernard Kettlewell.
Electromagnetic field and high-tension power lines.
Fracking and pollution.
What constitutes responsible conduct from the point+A76 of view of human and animal subjects in research?
The ethics of the pharmaceutical industry.
Science and the public.
The role of government in scientific misconduct?
The responsibility of science to the environment.
Is there some research that shouldn't be done because of threats the results may pose to society?
Summary of ethics guidelines of STEM professional societies.
Can Scientific misconduct be prevented?
Intentional negligence in acknowledgment of previous work.
Deliberate fabrication of data.
Deliberate omission of known data that doesn't agree with hypotheses.
Passing another researcher's data as one's own.
Publication of results without consent of all the researchers.
Failure to acknowledge all the researchers who performed the work.
Conflict-of-interest issues.
Repeated publication of too-similar results.
Breach of confidentiality.
Misrepresenting others' work.
Wrapping up.
Case Studies.
Darwin and Wallace.
Rangaswamy Srinivasan-VISX patent dispute.
Schwartz and Mirkin.
Corey and Woodward.
Cordova, Scripps Research Institute, and Stockholm University.
La Clair and hexacyclinol.
Woodward and quinine.
DNA.
David Baltimore and Teresa Imanishi-Kari.
John Fenn-Yale patent dispute.
VIOXX (R).
Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より