A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law
著者
書誌事項
A critique of the ontology of intellectual property law
（Cambridge intellectual property and information law）
Cambridge University Press, 2021
- タイトル別名
-
Kritik der Ontologie des Immaterialgüterrechts
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全2件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Tranlslation of: Kritik der Ontologie des Immaterialgüterrechts
Originally published: Mohr Siebeck, 2018
Includes bibliographical references (p. 171-200) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Intellectual property (IP) law operates with the ontological assumption that immaterial goods such as works, inventions, and designs exist, and that these abstract types can be owned like a piece of land. Alexander Peukert provides a comprehensive critique of this paradigm, showing that the abstract IP object is a speech-based construct, which first crystalised in the eighteenth century. He highlights the theoretical flaws of metaphysical object ontology and introduces John Searle's social ontology as a more plausible approach to the subject matter of IP. On this basis, he proposes an IP theory under which IP rights provide their holders with an exclusive privilege to use reproducible 'Master Artefacts.' Such a legal-realist IP theory, Peukert argues, is both descriptively and prescriptively superior to the prevailing paradigm of the abstract IP object. This work was originally published in German and was translated by Gill Mertens.
目次
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Two ontologies
- 3. Two abstractions
- 4. Interim summary: an implausible paradigm
- 5. The legal explanatory power of the two ontologies
- 6. Normative critique of the abstract IP object.
「Nielsen BookData」 より
