Reading Job with St. Thomas Aquinas
著者
書誌事項
Reading Job with St. Thomas Aquinas
(Thomistic ressourcement series, v. 15)
Catholic University of America Press, c2020
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 385-397) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
Reading Job with St. Thomas Aquinas is a scholarly contribution to Thomistic studies, specifically to the study of Aquinas's biblical exegesis in relation to his philosophy and theology. Each of the thirteen chapters has a different focus, within the shared concentration of the book on Aquinas's Literal Exposition on Job. The essays are arranged in three Parts: "Job and Sacra Doctrina"; "Providence and Suffering"; and "Job and the Moral Life". Boyle's opening essay argues that Aquinas's commentary seeks to show what is required in the "Magister" (namely, Job and God) for the effective communication of wisdom. Mansini's essay argues that by speaking, God reveals the virtue of Job and its value in God's providence; without the personal revelation or speech of God, Job could not have known the value of his suffering. Vijgen's essay explores the commentary's use of Aristotle for reflecting upon divine providence, sorrow and anger, resurrection, and the new heavens and new earth. Levering's essay explores the commentary's citations of the Gospel of John and argues that these pertain especially to divine speech and to light/darkness. Bonino's essay explains why divine incomprehensibility does not mean that Job is wrong to seek to understand God's ways. Te Velde's essay explores how Aquinas's commentary draws upon the reasoning of his Summa contra gentiles with regard to the good order of the universe. Goris's essay reflects upon how, according to Aquinas's commentary, sin is and is not related to suffering. Knasas's essay argues that Aquinas does not hold that the resurrection of the body is a necessary philosophical corollary of the human desire for happiness. Wawrykow's essay explores merit, in relation to the connection between sin and punishment/affliction as well as to the connection between good actions and flourishing. Spezzano's essay shows that Job's hope and filial fear transform his suffering, making him an exemplar of the consolation they provide to the just. Mullady's essay reflects upon the moral problems and opportunities posed by the passions, along with the ordering of the virtues to the reward of human happiness. Flood's essay shows how Aquinas defends Job's possession of the qualities needed for true friendship (including friendship with God), such as patience, delight in the presence of the friend, and compassion. Lastly, Kromholtz's essay argues that although Aquinas's Literal Exposition on Job never extensively engages eschatology, Aquinas depends throughout upon the reasonableness of hoping for the resurrection of the body and the final judgment.
「Nielsen BookData」 より