The acceptance and expression of prejudice during the Trump era
著者
書誌事項
The acceptance and expression of prejudice during the Trump era
（Cambridge elements, . Elements in American politics / edited by Frances E. Lee）
Cambridge University Press, 2020
- : pbk
- タイトル別名
-
American politics
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全3件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Subtitles on cover: American politics
Includes bibliographical references
内容説明・目次
内容説明
What are the consequences when politicians make prejudiced statements? Theories about the suppression of prejudice argue that people are likely to express more prejudice when they believe that norms are more permissive than they may have otherwise assumed. Using a series of experiments carried out during and since the 2016 campaign, Brian Schaffner shows that being exposed to Donald Trump's prejudiced rhetoric causes people to express more prejudice themselves. Notably, this is not merely a 'Trump Effect;' people's commitment to anti-prejudice norms is undermined even when exposed to prejudiced rhetoric attributed to unnamed politicians. These findings are consequential; if politicians increasingly feel at liberty to express explicit prejudice, then the mass public is likely to take cues from such behavior, leading them to express more prejudice themselves. This may lead to increasingly heightened inter-group tensions which could pose a threat to political and social stability in the United States.
目次
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Trump's Victory and Increased Agreement with Prejudiced Statements
- 3. Acceptance of Trump's Sexist Rhetoric
- 4. A Direct Test of the 'Trump Effect'
- 5. How Elite Prejudice Alters Support for Norms
- 6. Does Calling Out Prejudiced Rhetoric Work?
- 7. Conclusion.
「Nielsen BookData」 より