Performance funding for public higher education : fad or trend?
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Performance funding for public higher education : fad or trend?
(New directions for institutional research, no. 97)
Jossey-Bass, c1998
- : [pbk.]
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
"Vol. 25, no. 1"--T.p. verso
Includes bibliographies and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Performance funding for public higher education has become a popular topic in state capitols in the 1990s. The time seemed right for tying resources to results. Performance funding represents the most recent step in the search for external accountability and improved performance that started with outcomes assessment and performance reporting. The chapters in this volume examine the conflicts and issues raised by performance funding as well as the similarities and differences in state programs. They reflect the information gathered and lessons learned from a national study of performance funding supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts. This is the 97th issue of the quarterly journal New Directions for Institutional Research.
Table of Contents
1. Performance Funding: Present Status and Future Prospects (Joseph
C. Burke).
2. Precursors of Performance Funding (Andreea M. Serban).
3. State Synopses of Performance Funding Programs (Joseph C.
Burke & Andreea M. Serban).
4. Performance Funding Indicators: Concerns, Values, and Models
for State Colleges and Universities (Joseph C. Burke).
5. Performance Funding Criteria, Levels, and Methods (Andreea M.
Serban).
6. Opinions and Attitudes of State and Campus Policymakers
(Andreea M. Serban).
7. Performance Funding: Arguments and Answers (Joseph C.
Burke).
References.
Appendix A: Categories of Indicators and Measures.
Appendix B: Performance Funding Indicators: Number and
Applicability by Sector.
Appendix C: Performance Funding Opinion and Attitude Survey.
Appendix D: Hypothetical Performance Funding Plan.
by "Nielsen BookData"